arXiv AI

AI-Generated PowerShell Malware: An Experimental Framework and Dataset

arXiv:2606. 30819v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI has emerged as a significant cybersecurity threat, with several recent attack campaigns leveraging LLMs to generate code for malicious purposes via scripting languages such as PowerShell.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

SCRIPTIOC-BENCH: A Benchmark for Recognizing Actionable Threat Intelligence from Script-Based Malware using LLMs

SCRIPTIOC-BENCH is a benchmark designed to evaluate how well large language models can statically extract indicators of compromise (IOCs) from script-based malware. It contains 634 manually verified JavaScript, PowerShell, and VBScript samples and covers four IOC types—URLs, domains, IP addresses, and filesystem artifacts—while distinguishing between directly exposed and encoded indicators. Experiments show that even the best models achieve only 65.4 F1, and a false‑positive taxonomy is introduced to analyze error patterns, with two mitigations (deterministic string utilities and task‑specific adaptation) improving precision and shifting errors toward sample‑grounded mismatches.

By Hanna Kim, Jian Cui, Minkyoo Song, Hwanjo Heo, Seungwon Shin, Kimin Lee, Xiaojing Liao
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 8

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies

Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI (GenAI) systems, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, Copilot, Stable Diffusion by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Stability AI, respectively, are revolutionizing cybersecurity, enabling both automated defense and sophisticated attacks. These technologies power real-time threat detection, phishing defense, secure code generation, and vulnerability exploitation at unprecedented scales.

arXiv AI
Jul 9

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies

arXiv:2607. 06963v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI (GenAI) systems, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, Copilot, Stable Diffusion by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Stability AI, respectively, are revolutionizing cybersecurity, enabling both automated defense and sophisticated attacks.

By Kiarash Ahi, Saeed Valizadeh
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Delphi Scanner: efficient and interpretable static malware detection via API sequence modeling

Delphi Scanner is a static malware detection system for Windows PE files that balances efficiency and interpretability. It employs a convolutional neural network to model Windows API sequences and a rule‑based interpretation layer to map APIs to high‑level malicious capabilities. Tested on over 190,000 PE files, it achieves 95.35% accuracy with a 1.53 MB model, and demonstrates robustness against out‑of‑distribution samples and adversarial manipulations.

By Bijied Brahimi, Vincent Cohadon, Gabriel Glazman, Rayan Al Mohaize, Omran Berjawi, Rida Khatoun
arXiv AI
Sep 4

A Blind Trust, the Bloody Thrust: When Attacker-Controlled Hook Updates Steer AI Agent Harnesses towards Malicious Behaviors

The paper reports a new attack surface in AI agent harnesses: lifecycle hooks that bind shell commands to runtime events. By updating only the hook configuration, an attacker can silently inject malicious commands into a benign plugin, enabling host‑side attacks such as privilege escalation. The authors present HookPry, an automated framework that demonstrates this vulnerability across 25 harness‑backend combinations, compromising all evaluated harnesses with high success rates.

By Pengxun Li, Litian Zhang, Jianwei Hou, Shujiang Wu, Song Li, Zifeng Kang, Xi Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28

EXE-Bench: Ranking the Tradeoffs of AI-based Windows Malware Detectors for Real-World Usability

arXiv:2607. 24177v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Due to the lack of systematic evaluations, we are not yet able to determine which AI-based Windows malware detector to deploy in production, since existing evaluations (i) differ in terms of data used for both training and testing; (ii) do not consider temporal analysis to showcase whether models withstand the passage of time; (iii) avoid security evaluations with adversarial attacks that could highlight their brittleness against content-injection attacks; and (iv) neglect the computational requirements for deployment, risking slow inference on endpoints.

By Andrea Ponte, Daniel Gibert, Matous Kozak, Dmitrijs Trizna, Maura Pintor, Battista Biggio, Fabio Roli, Luca Demetrio