Hugging Face Trending Papers

Scaffolding Minds: Optimizing Latent Visual Target Representations for Multimodal Reasoning

Latent reasoning has advanced multimodal reasoning through a two-stage training paradigm: (1) a helper image is encoded into latent tokens to teach visual chain-of-thought during a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage, and (2) these latent tokens are further refined with reward feedback during a reinforcement learning (RL) stage. In this paper, we identify two key limitations of this framework, one in each stage.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 21

Scaffolding Minds: Optimizing Latent Visual Target Representations for Multimodal Reasoning

arXiv:2608. 19669v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Latent reasoning has advanced multimodal reasoning through a two-stage training paradigm: (1) a helper image is encoded into latent tokens to teach visual chain-of-thought during a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage, and (2) these latent tokens are further refined with reward feedback during a reinforcement learning (RL) stage.

By Haoqiang Kang, Yinpeng Chen, Luyang Liu, Jesper Sparre Andersen, Abhijit Ogale, Baochen Sun, Lichan Hong, Ed H. Chi
arXiv AI
Oct 9

SLVR: Structured Latent Visual Reasoning via Human-like Reasoning Flows

SLVR (Structured Latent Visual Reasoning) is a training framework that blends explicit chain-of-thought with latent reasoning for multimodal large language models. It organizes reasoning into typed latent stages—planning, grounding, evidence selection, and integration—each supervised by corresponding signals such as plans, bounding boxes, visual evidence, and final rationales. Built on Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B, SLVR consistently improves performance on multimodal reasoning benchmarks, achieving significant gains on MMVP, BLINK Relation, V*, MathVista, and ChartQA.

By Albert Gao, Bing Xue, Andrea Zanette
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

Unfold The World: Factorize 4D Properties in Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning

The paper introduces FactoSR, a factorized reinforcement learning framework designed to improve spatial reasoning in Vision‑Language Models (VLMs). By decomposing the problem into planar correspondence (XY), depth consistency (Z), and temporal reversibility (T), FactoSR addresses the dimensional mismatch between 2D visual inputs and 3D physical reasoning. Experiments on multi‑view and video benchmarks show significant performance gains, with a 5.9% improvement on VSI‑Bench and 4.5% on All‑Angles‑Bench.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

VaME: Exploring Variational Latent Reasoning for Multimodal Embeddings

VaME (Variational Multimodal Embeddings) introduces a framework that treats latent reasoning as a learnable distribution over trajectories, enabling autoregressive exploration in latent space guided by answer reconstruction. By augmenting embedding-token readout with a latent-fused embedding and optimizing over stochastic variational trajectories via reinforcement learning with a Semantic Decoding Reward, VaME achieves superior performance on the MMEB-V2 benchmark and reasoning-intensive tasks like MRMR. The method also delivers at least a 4.25× inference speedup compared to deterministic latent autoregressive baselines.

By Peixi Wu, Mingzhou Jiang, Feipeng Ma, Biao Yang, Yunhao Zhou, Wei Yuan, Bosong Chai, Huizu Lin, Jie Chen, Zhangchi Hu, Fan Yang, Wenwu Ou, Hebei Li, Xiaoyan Sun
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

Unfold The World: Factorize 4D Properties in Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning

The paper introduces FactoSR, a factorized reinforcement learning framework designed to improve spatial reasoning in Vision‑Language Models by addressing a dimensional mismatch between 2D visual inputs and the 3D+temporal nature of the physical world. FactoSR decomposes the reasoning task into three orthogonal geometric sub‑objectives—planar correspondence (XY), depth consistency (Z), and temporal reversibility (T)—and optimizes these constraints within a unified policy learning mechanism. Experiments on multi‑view and video benchmarks show that this decomposition yields significant performance gains, achieving a 5.9% improvement on VSI‑Bench and 4.5% on All‑Angles‑Bench.

By Yijun Yang, Shenghe Zheng, Wenbo Li, Jianhui Liu, Haoze Sun, Yanbing Zhang, Jiaxiu Jiang, Lin Song, Haoyang Huang, Nan Duan, Lei Zhu