arXiv AI

Do Latent Channels Actually Communicate? A Causal Audit of Latent Multi-Agent LLM

arXiv:2607. 26773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent communication in large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) transmits continuous internal representations instead of text, but greater representational capacity does not establish that the receiver uses task-relevant information.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

Do Latent Channels Actually Communicate? A Causal Audit of Latent Multi-Agent LLM

Latent communication in large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) transmits continuous internal representations instead of text, but greater representational capacity does not establish that the receiver uses task-relevant information. End-task performance alone also cannot reveal whether an observed effect depends on message presence, content generated for the evaluated example, or information supplied by a separate agent.

arXiv AI
2d ago

Beyond Final Accuracy: Auditing Communication in LLM Multi-Agent Systems

The paper introduces Independent–Communicate–Revise (ICR), a framework that isolates communication effects in large language model multi‑agent systems by fixing initial reasoning and measuring how messages influence answer revision. ICR evaluates correction, preservation, and selectivity across four reasoning benchmarks, revealing that similar overall accuracy can mask divergent revision behaviors. The study shows that richer messages can both improve and harm outcomes, and that receiver policies can shift preservation and correction dynamics differently across tasks.

By Shixuan Li, Wei Yang, Peiyu Zhang, Anzhe Cheng, Heng Ping, Paul Bogdan
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Beyond the Transcript: Detecting Covert Co ordination in Latent Multi-Agent Communication

The paper introduces Verifiable Latent Alignments (VLA), a framework that monitors and steers hidden communication channels between language‑model agents. VLA links private latent states to public actions via event identifiers, enabling causal analysis. Experiments on a multi‑agent auction benchmark show high detection accuracy and effective mitigation of collusion, even without training on attack examples.

By Ramneet Kaur, Pradyumna Chari, Ramesh Raskar, Jugad Singh, Sumit Kumar Jha, Anirban Roy
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Faithful, Not Corrective: Model Capability Governs Message-Format Effects in Multi-Hop Agent Relays

The study investigates how different message formats affect the fidelity of information as it passes through multiple LLM agent relays. Using a controlled testbed, the authors encode twelve atomic facts in five formats (free natural language, precision‑instructed NL, JSON, triples, key‑value) across six hops and evaluate recall against programmatic ground truth. Results show that strong relays maintain near‑lossless recall for all formats, while weaker relays exhibit significant format‑dependent recall loss, and that any injected error is faithfully propagated across all formats without causing collateral damage.

By Sicheng Zeng