arXiv Machine Learning

Data-Driven Energy-Based Learning via Gibbs Measures on Hierarchical Structures

arXiv:2606. 30064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce a data-driven probabilistic framework for learning systems based on Gibbs measures on hierarchical structures.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Bridging Control, Inference, Transport, and Thermodynamics: From Theory to Applications in Learning

The review explores how control theory, optimal transport, probabilistic inference, non‑equilibrium thermodynamics, and machine learning are interconnected through the optimization of free‑energy‑like functionals under dynamical or statistical constraints. It presents a conceptual thread linking these five fields and illustrates the ideas with applications in reinforcement learning, variational inference, and generative modeling. The article is written for readers without prior familiarity, beginning with physics principles.

By Emmy Blumenthal, Nikolas Claussen, Benjamin Eysenbach, Catherine Ji, Gautam Reddy, Colin Scheibner, Benjamin Sorkin
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

Equilibrium Training of Energy-Based Models with Parallel Trajectory Tempering

Energy-Based Models (EBMs) provide an interpretable framework for generative modeling of scientific data, but poor Markov Chain Monte Carlo mixing often limits their reliability. We introduce a training algorithm based on Parallel Trajectory Tempering (PTT), which exploits the continuity of the optimization path to maintain equilibrium sampling throughout learning.

arXiv Statistics ML
Sep 18

Equivalence Between Nested Gibbs Measures and Log-Linear Combinations of Gibbs Measures

The paper investigates three operations on Gibbs probability measures: renormalization, normalized log-linear combination, and nesting (changing the reference measure). It shows that the measures produced by the second and third operations solve related optimization problems and that, for specific parameters, nesting one Gibbs measure into another is equivalent to log-linearly combining them. This equivalence has practical implications, such as enabling a one-shot federated learning system where clients’ locally trained Gibbs algorithms can be combined on a server to match the performance of a centrally trained Gibbs algorithm.

By Yaiza Bermudez, Samir M. Perlaza, I\~naki Esnaola
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Quenched Ensemble Sampling

arXiv:2609.15894v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Some of the sharpest challenges in sampling from the energy functions of physical systems arise at phase transitions, where the density of states cha...

By David Yallup
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

FrOGS: Discrete Neural Sampler for Independent Alloy Configurations Across Chemical Conditions

FrOGS is a hybrid discrete neural sampler that couples an autoregressive model with a continuous-time Markov chain, trained under a single shared loss to sample alloy configurations across many chemical conditions. It produces independent, unbiased configurations, estimates the partition function, and yields consistent thermodynamic observables on a common absolute free‑energy scale. The method matches exact results for the 2D Ising model and reproduces reference phase diagrams for AgPd and CuAu, avoiding mode collapse and correctly recovering the stability range of the CuAu$_3$ phase.

By Kyucheol Min, Elyssa Hofgard, Tess Smidt
arXiv AI
Jul 20

Energy-based Transport for Amortized Bayesian Inference

arXiv:2605. 15407v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider amortized Bayesian inference for nonlinear inverse problems using only samples from the joint distribution of parameters and observations, including problems with unknown functions in a Banach space.

By Ricardo Baptista, Hojjat Kaveh, Andrew M. Stuart
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Machine learning kinetics from molecular dynamics data

The article reviews modern machine learning techniques for estimating the committor and related kinetic statistics from molecular dynamics simulations. It emphasizes self‑supervised methods that solve the underlying dynamical equations instead of relying on labeled data, and unifies various approaches—generator‑based PDEs, variational principles, Markov state models, dynamical Galerkin approximation, and neural networks—under a common operator framework. The review also discusses practical guidance for handling non‑Markovian effects, sampling strategies, and outlines future research directions such as connections to reinforcement learning and generative modeling.

By Jonathan Weare, Aaron R. Dinner