arXiv:2511. 09373v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLMs now tackle a wide range of software-related tasks, yet we show that their performance varies markedly both across and within these tasks.
By Adam \v{S}torek, Vikas Upadhyay, Marianne Menglin Liu, Daniel W. Peterson, Anshul Mittal, Sujeeth Bharadwaj, Fahad Shah, Sujith Ravi, Dan Roth
arXiv:2606. 07587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM routing has become a popular approach to improve the cost-quality trade-off of LLM services by dynamically selecting a model for each query.
By Yifan Lu, Qiyue Zhang, Shenrun Zhang, Zhibo Yu, Zhuang Wang, Hanjie Chen, Jiarong Xing
arXiv:2603.04445v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: The rapid growth of large language models (LLMs) with diverse capabilities, costs, and domains has created a critical need for intelligent mo...
By Yasmin Moslem, John D. Kelleher
arXiv:2606. 02581v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) faces a fundamental three-way tension: deeper retrieval improves factual grounding but inflates token costs and end-to-end latency.
By Sanjay Mishra
arXiv:2607. 22465v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Routing to select large language models (LLMs) with different cost-quality trade-offs has become a fundamental deployment feature of enterprise AI.
By Ritik Raj, Souvik Kundu, Sarbartha Banerjee, Dheemanth Joshi, Ishita Vohra, Tushar Krishna
The paper "Towards Optimizing SQL Generation via LLM Routing" proposes a routing approach for Text-to-SQL tasks that dynamically selects the most cost‑effective large language model (LLM) for each query. Two routing strategies—score‑based and classification‑based—are introduced, achieving accuracy comparable to the best LLM while reducing latency and monetary cost. The authors design the routers for easy training and efficient inference, and demonstrate a practical accuracy‑cost trade‑off on the BIRD dataset.
By Mohammadhossein Malekpour, Nour Shaheen, Foutse Khomh, Amine Mhedhbi
The paper introduces SaveRouter, a sparse‑supervision framework for large language model routing that selectively gathers informative model feedback and shares capability information across related queries. By using only about 33–41% of available training feedback, SaveRouter achieves competitive or superior routing quality while reducing the break‑even deployment volume by 1.9–9.5× compared to conventional routers. The study also shows that the supervision level that minimizes serving cost may differ from the one that yields the earliest payback.
By Guannan Lai, Gelin Bian, Hao-Xuan Ma, Jun-Peng Jiang, Long Chen, Jian-Dong Liu, Zhi-Hao Tan, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv:2608. 00106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic systems must decide not only what answer to produce, but which reasoning and execution operations should precede it.
By Natan Vidra, Alina Kapanova, Arun Kanhai, Spurthi Setty
arXiv:2602. 09924v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Running LLMs with extended reasoning on every problem is expensive, but determining which inputs actually require additional compute remains challenging.
By William Lugoloobi, Thomas Foster, William Bankes, Chris Russell
arXiv:2603. 20895v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing routers rely on semantic query features or handcrafted features, which often fail to capture model-specific failures or intrinsic task difficulty.
By Tanay Varshney, Annie Surla, Michelle Xu, Gomathy Venkata Krishnan, Maximilian Jeblick, David Austin, Neal Vaidya, Davide Onofrio
arXiv:2606. 22902v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Real-world users typically have access to multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) from different providers, and these LLMs often excel at distinct domains, yet none dominate all.
By Pengfei Zhou, Zhiwei Tang, Yixing Ma, Jiasheng Tang, Yizeng Han, Zhenglin Wan, Fanqing Meng, Wei Wang, Bohan Zhuang, Wangbo Zhao, Yang You
Dynamic LLM routers aim to reduce inference costs by directing each query to the cheapest capable model. In a study of six commercial routers across 14 settings and eight task categories, none surpassed a simple random router that selects between two well-chosen models at the same cost, with some underperforming by over 10 percentage points. The authors identify four common patterns—difficulty blindness, length reversal, semantic matching, and roster suboptimality—that explain this gap and propose a new evaluation method and a simple two-model router that mitigates these patterns, though its advantage over random routing remains modest.
By Sam Wang, Julia White, Sahibzada Allahyar, Dhruv Atreja, Urchade Zaratiana, Kelton Zhang