arXiv:2607. 14998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper suggests the adoption of a novel inversion in AI ethics: instead of asking how humans should treat artificial superintelligence (ASI), it examines how future sentient ASI may morally consider and evaluate humanity.
By Jean-Paul Van Belle
arXiv:2512. 03077v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The accelerated development, deployment and adoption of artificial intelligence systems has been fuelled by the increasing presence of big tech in the AI field.
By Alex Hernandez-Garcia, Alexandra Volokhova, Ezekiel Williams, Dounia Shaaban Kabakibo, M\'elisande Teng
arXiv:2608. 05656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety risks of AI are becoming increasingly evident in human interactions with AI technologies.
By Jessica Y. Bo, Paula Akemi Aoyagui, Shalaleh Rismani, Dipto Das, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Ashton Anderson
arXiv:2508. 09219v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in AI applications have raised growing concerns about the need for ethical guidelines and regulations to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies.
By Wilder Baldwin, Sepideh Ghanavati, Manuel Woersdoerfer
During the AI and Society Forum, leading MIT researchers examined critical questions about AI’s influence on employment and democracy.
By Benjamin Daniel | School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
We’ve co-authored a paper that forecasts how malicious actors could misuse AI technology, and potential ways we can prevent and mitigate these threats. This paper is the outcome of almost a year of sustained work with our colleagues at the Future of Humanity Institute, the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, the Center for a New American Security, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and others.
I’ve always considered myself a pragmatic technologist—someone who loves technology not for its own sake, but for the direct impact it can have on people’s lives. That’s what makes this job so exciting, since I believe AI will unlock more opportunities for more people than any other technology in history.
We’ve contributed to a multi-stakeholder report by 58 co-authors at 30 organizations, including the Centre for the Future of Intelligence, Mila, Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, and Center for Security and Emerging Technologies. This report describes 10 mechanisms to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We’ve written a paper arguing that long-term AI safety research needs social scientists to ensure AI alignment algorithms succeed when actual humans are involved. Properly aligning advanced AI systems with human values requires resolving many uncertainties related to the psychology of human rationality, emotion, and biases.
arXiv:2608. 05436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The life sciences and health research have started to benefit from artificial intelligence, which raises ethical concerns that are real but, we argue, not special.
By Jean-Pierre Changeux, Gustavo Deco, Morten L. Kringelbach