arXiv:2608. 01651v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hybrid-attention large language models combine full attention with recurrent linear attention to reduce long-context inference costs, yet their autoregressive decoding remains memory-bound.
By Li Wang, Yi Su, Xiabao Wu, Chiran You, Yongchao Liu, Zhan Qiu, Juelu Zhang, Jiajun Zheng, Fangxin Liu, Jie Zhang, Chen Tian, Chengying Huan
arXiv:2606. 10487v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying large language models in user-facing systems requires efficient output safety filtering.
By Huizhen Shu, Xuying Li, Piao Xue
arXiv:2607. 03333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents are becoming a common interface for research, coding, and question answering, yet their Thought-Action-Observation loop is often serial: the model reasons, emits a tool call, then idles the GPU until the result returns.
By Huajun Bai, Weiwei Lv, Huichuan Zheng, Youyou Lu, Jiwu Shu
arXiv:2512. 22420v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates LLM inference by verifying draft tokens in parallel.
By Rui Li, Zhaoning Zhang, Libo Zhang, Huaimin Wang, Xiang Fu, Zhiquan Lai
arXiv:2608.30703v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Runtime guardrails are essential for reliable large language model (LLM) deployment, yet existing approaches typically rely on independent, external...
By Sing Team
Verification-Aware Training (VAT) is a plug‑in framework that improves speculative decoding for large language models by simulating verification during training and using the resulting accept/reject patterns as supervision. VAT adds a lightweight binary verification head to predict whether each draft token will survive sequential verification, and replaces the fixed per‑position weighting with a verification‑adaptive schedule that keeps full weight up to the first rejection point. When applied to EAGLE‑3 and DFlash on Qwen3‑4B, Qwen3‑8B, and LLaMA‑3.1‑8B, VAT increases average acceptance length by up to 11.4% and wall‑clock speedup by up to 8.7%, yielding consistent gains across math, code, and chat benchmarks.
By Geonmo Gu, Byeongho Heo, HeeJae Jun, Yoohoon Kang, Sangmin Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han
arXiv:2606. 01019v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) generation remains expensive because autoregressive decoding calls the model once for each new token.
By Xin Su, Dawid Majchrowski, Fangyuan Yu, Vanshil Atul Shah, Sebastian Rogawski, Pawel Morkisz, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Phillip Howard
arXiv:2606. 19755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative inference accelerates large language model (LLM) decoding but provides no inherent safety guarantees.
By Haotian Xu, Zeyang Zhang, Linbao Li, Huadi Zheng, Yu Li, Cheng Zhuo
arXiv:2607. 08690v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates sampling from an autoregressive LLM by using a faster auxiliary model to draft tokens which are then verified in parallel by the LLM.
By Guoxuan Xia, Luka Ribar, Paul Balanca
arXiv:2607. 14952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A growing gap separates inference context lengths from RL post-training: inference systems are approaching million-token contexts, while post-training workloads often remain at 256K tokens or below and rely on length generalization at deployment.
By Changhai Zhou, Kieran Liu, Yuhua Zhou, Qian Qiao, Jun Gao, Harry Zhang, Irvine Lu, Nolan Ho, Lucian Li, Andrew Lei, Cleon Cheng, Steven Chiang, Yihang Zeng, Di Zhang, Rio Yang, Kaijie Chen, Andrew Chen, Pony Ma, Weizhong Zhang, Cheng Jin
arXiv:2411. 05894v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speculative Decoding has emerged as a popular technique for accelerating inference in Large Language Models.
By Michele Marzollo, Jiawei Zhuang, Niklas Roemer, Niklas Zwingenberger, Lorenz K. M\"uller, Lukas Cavigelli
arXiv:2605.15508v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The quadratic complexity of attention imposes severe memory and computational bottlenecks on Large Language Model (LLM) inference. This challenge i...
By Jiangnan Yu, Ceyu Xu, Yongji Wu, Yuan Xie