The paper introduces SHIFT, a method for unlearning in large language models that avoids explicit forgetting targets by shrinking a fine‑tuned model toward its pre‑fine‑tuning weights and briefly relearning the retain set. In the linearized regime, this shrink‑and‑heal lookahead moves the model a fixed fraction toward the retrained model, and SHIFT extrapolates these per‑token changes into distillation targets for iterative refinement. Evaluated against eleven baselines under the OpenUnlearning protocol, SHIFT achieves the highest aggregate score across all TOFU settings, aligns 3.7× closer to the oracle than the next best method, and preserves the most retain knowledge on MUSE, maintaining proximity to the oracle even under larger optimization budgets and relearning attacks.
arXiv:2609.37076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models trained on vast corpora inherently risk memorizing harmful content that may later re-emerge in their outputs. To mitigate this is...
arXiv:2606. 02920v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-model unlearning updates a trained model to behave as if it had not seen selected training examples, while preserving utility and avoiding costly retraining.
arXiv:2605. 12765v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models memorize vast amounts of training data, raising concerns regarding privacy, copyright infringement, and safety.
CALIBURN is a new approach to large language model (LLM) unlearning that measures a model’s confidence in undesirable knowledge and uses this measure to fine‑tune unlearning gradient updates. By doing so, it offers more precise control over what is forgotten while better preserving the model’s overall utility. Experiments on benchmarks such as MUSE and WMDP show that CALIBURN outperforms existing methods in balancing knowledge removal with utility retention.
arXiv:2605. 07482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to selectively remove memorized content such as private data, copyrighted text, or hazardous knowledge, without costly full retraining.
arXiv:2610.09835v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual pre-training and fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) inevitably induce catastrophic forgetting, typically mitigated by replay using o...
The paper introduces Propose-Then-Project Unlearning (PTP-U), a method for large language model unlearning that first weakens target knowledge associations and then projects non-target outputs back to the original distribution to recover capabilities. PTP-U aims to satisfy forgetting constraints while preserving fluent generation and performance on non-target tasks. Experiments on three benchmarks show PTP-U achieves a strong forgetting‑retention trade‑off, with 81.22%–91.03% forgetting and an average of 94.20% non‑target utility.
arXiv:2610.26864v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gradient ascent (GA) is a simple language-model unlearning baseline, but it continues increasing forget loss after useful forgetting has occurred. Th...
arXiv:2607.27836v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model unlearning is consistently fragile under relearn attacks. On TOFU, fine-tuning on twenty forget examples substantially recover...
arXiv:2606. 06320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model while preserving its general capabilities.
arXiv:2608. 05783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine unlearning has become a critical capability for safely removing specific, sensitive knowledge from large language models (LLMs).
The paper introduces Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer‑selective unlearning framework for large language models. FOM-UL uses a forget‑to‑retain significance score to identify transformer layers that strongly influence the forget set while being insensitive to the retain set, allowing targeted updates that preserve most of the model. Experiments on TOFU, KnowUnDo, and MUSE-style benchmarks show that FOM-UL reduces residual memorization and maintains utility better than several baselines, even after 8‑bit and 4‑bit post‑training quantization, and it also limits recovery of forgotten content in adversarial prompt tests.