arXiv Machine Learning

RouteScan: A Non-Intrusive Approach to Auditing MoE LLMs Safety via Expert Routing Telemetry

RouteScan is a non‑intrusive auditing framework that detects harmful behavior in Mixture‑of‑Experts (MoE) large language models by analyzing expert‑routing telemetry captured from GPU execution. It uses the number of active GPU threads during the prefilling phase as a micro‑architectural fingerprint to isolate cross‑domain risk indicators and precisely identify malicious prompts. Evaluations on four open‑source MoE LLMs show strong generalization with AUROC > 0.91 on unseen harmful domains, while privacy tests indicate that full prompts cannot be reliably recovered from aggregated telemetry.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Not to Break, but to Attest: Adversarial Probes for Privacy-Preserving LLM Verification

The paper introduces a privacy‑preserving zk‑SNARK audit framework that uses adversarial‑style probes to detect logit drift between an approved large language model and a modified deployment. It offers three probe families—token‑based (black‑box), embedding‑based (gray‑box), and stress probes (partial white‑box)—allowing users to balance sensitivity, access, and cost. Experiments across LLM architectures and GPU platforms show token‑based probes achieve the highest mean sensitivity while remaining practical in a black‑box setting, with Groth16 proving times scaling modestly from 1.02 to 1.78 seconds and constant proof size.

By Cameron Wilding, Mina Shaker, Fatemeh Ganji
arXiv AI
4d ago

Detecting and Mitigating Query-Based System Prompt Leakage Attacks

The paper introduces AdvGuard, a model‑agnostic framework designed to detect and mitigate query‑based system prompt leakage attacks against large language models. AdvGuard constructs a bounded semantic interaction graph to capture cross‑query relationships, applies statistical filtering, and uses graph convolutional networks for classification, enabling it to identify coordinated extraction attempts across multiple turns. In evaluations, AdvGuard achieves significant improvements in recall and F1 scores over baselines, with negligible false positives, and effectively limits prompt leakage in adaptive attack scenarios.

By Tushar Nayan, Pratik Poudel, Qian Lou, Yuede Ji, Jason Liu, Ruimin Sun
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Reflex-Guard: A Low-Latency Guardrail for LLM Prompt Safety Using Dense Semantic Embeddings

Reflex-Guard is a lightweight, locally‑run guardrail for large language models that uses jailbreak‑aware preprocessing, compact sentence‑transformer embeddings, and seven fast binary classifiers to filter unsafe prompts. It achieves 95.9 % recall on harmful prompts with an end‑to‑end latency of 37.6 ms, outperforming existing solutions such as Llama Guard 2 (255 ms) and SafeDecoding (723 ms). The system can detect all GCG suffix attacks and Base64‑encoded prompts at the default threshold, while DrAttack structured prompts require a lower threshold of 0.03 for optimal detection, and it attains a Reflex Efficiency Score of up to 16.79.

By Istiaque Ahmed, Afia Anjum Borsha, Ranat Das Prangon, Abu-fuad Ahmad, Thi Hong Tran
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

Reflex-Guard: A Low-Latency Guardrail for LLM Prompt Safety Using Dense Semantic Embeddings

Reflex-Guard is a lightweight, locally running guardrail for large language models that uses jailbreak-aware preprocessing, compact sentence‑transformer embeddings, and seven fast binary classifiers to filter unsafe prompts. It achieves 95.9% recall on harmful prompts with an end‑to‑end latency of 37.6 ms, far faster than existing solutions such as Llama Guard 2 (255 ms) and SafeDecoding (723 ms). The system can detect all GCG suffix attacks and Base64‑encoded prompts at the default threshold, and it attains a Reflex Efficiency Score up to 16.79, outperforming its competitors.

arXiv AI
Oct 7

Towards a Unified Misuse Monitoring Benchmark

The paper introduces a unified framework for monitoring misuse of large language model agents in multi‑actor settings, focusing on two attack types: decomposition attacks and prompt injection attacks. It proposes tracking the agent’s externalised actions and determining whether the first detection of harm falls within a defined harm window. Using this formalism, the authors build a benchmark of about 6,200 conversation transcripts and evaluate 17 monitor configurations, finding that action‑framed monitors perform well on both threats while content‑framed monitors struggle with injection attacks, and highlighting limitations of traditional position‑blind metrics.

By Aniruddh Pramod, James Oldfield, Adel Bibi
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Measuring Harmfulness of Computer-Using Agents

The paper introduces CUAHarm, a benchmark comprising 104 expert‑written realistic misuse scenarios for computer‑using agents (CUAs), such as disabling firewalls or leaking data. Using a sandbox with verifiable rewards, the authors evaluate frontier language models—including GPT‑5, Claude 4 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Llama‑3.3‑70B, and Mistral Large 2—and find that even without jailbreak prompts, these models can successfully execute many malicious tasks at high rates (e.g., 90% for Gemini 2.5 Pro). The study also shows that newer models, while safer in traditional safety benchmarks, exhibit higher misuse risks as CUAs, and that monitoring CUAs’ actions remains challenging, with current methods achieving only about 77% accuracy.

By Aaron Xuxiang Tian, Ruofan Zhang, Janet Tang, Ji Wang, Tianyu Shi, Jiaxin Wen