arXiv AI

LLM-Driven Approach to Modeling Tool Interoperability in Automotive Domain

arXiv:2607. 14659v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interoperability between heterogeneous modeling tools remains a significant challenge in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), particularly in the automotive domain where multiple modeling languages, as well as defacto standard proprietary and open-source tools coexist.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

Rethinking Scientific Modeling: Toward Physically Consistent and Simulation-Executable Programmatic Generation

arXiv:2602. 07083v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Structural modeling is a fundamental component of computational engineering science, in which even minor physical inconsistencies or specification violations may invalidate downstream simulations.

By Yongqing Jiang, Jianze Wang, Zhiqi Shen, Zhenghong Lin, Jiayuan Wang, Yijian Yang, Kaoshan Dai, Haoran Luo
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Bridging Requirements and Architecture: Multi-Agent Orchestration with External Knowledge and Hierarchical Memory

arXiv:2606. 01385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Software architecture design is a critical yet inherently complex and knowledge-intensive phase that requires balancing competing quality attributes and adapting to evolving requirements.

By Ruiyin Li, Yiran Zhang, Xiyu Zhou, Yangxiao Cai, Peng Liang, Weisong Sun, Jifeng Xuan, Zhi Jin, Yang Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

LLM Evolution as an Industry-Scale Ecosystem: A Lifecycle Perspective on Continual Learning

arXiv:2606. 24901v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual learning capability is critical for Industrial LLMs, as deployed models must be continuously updated to meet evolving requirements and environments, rather than repeatedly retrained from scratch.

By Hao Jiang, Enneng Yang, Guojie Zhu, Yibin Chen, Yunkun Xu, Zifu Kou, Jiayi Li, Chong Chen, Zhao Cao, Li Shen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 7

Auto-DSM Under the Lens: A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based DSM Generation

This paper presents a black-box evaluation framework to systematically assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) from structured technical documentation. Motivated by the closed-source nature of current Auto-DSM pipelines, the framework introduces a reproducible methodology that benchmarks generated DSMs (GEN-DSMs) against manually validated ground-truth matrices (GT-DSMs).