Online resource allocation faces two coupled challenges: (1) allocating scarce resources efficiently under uncertain future demand, and (2) ensuring that agents report task valuations and requirements...
arXiv:2602. 05999v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How does the amount of compute available to a reinforcement learning (RL) policy affect its learning?
By Raj Ghugare, Micha{\l} Bortkiewicz, Alicja Ziarko, Benjamin Eysenbach
arXiv:2606. 09825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training reinforcement learning (RL) policies from scratch is costly: it requires careful reward and environment design, extensive tuning, and substantial computation.
By Anton Bolychev, Georgiy Malaniya, Sinan Ibrahim, Pavel Osinenko
arXiv:2507. 09473v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study the dynamic allocation of indivisible resources to strategic agents under long-term constraints, where the planner aims to maximize social welfare, satisfy multiple constraints, and elicit near-truthful reports.
By Yan Dai, Negin Golrezaei, Patrick Jaillet
The paper introduces ProAS, a Progress‑Aware Advantage Shaping framework designed to improve critic‑free reinforcement learning for large language model agents. ProAS uses a dynamic Agentic Reference Graph to provide fine‑grained credit assignment through Masking Unreasonable Incentives and Asymmetric Penalty Redistribution, avoiding the uniform advantage broadcast that can reinforce invalid actions. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑1.5B‑Instruct and Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct show that ProAS raises baseline success rates to 91.9% and 94.3% on ALFWorld and 66.7% and 70.8% on WebShop, while speeding up training convergence up to 2.44× and remaining robust to imperfect reference graphs.
By Bowen Ding, Mingda Wan, Yuhan Chen, Jiyao Yuan, Qi Zhu, Futing Wang, Heyuan Deng, Fei Mi, Lifeng Shang, Tao Lin
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as the primary paradigm for optimizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents, yet efficient critic-free algorithms (e.g., GRPO) suffer from a fundamental uniform cr...
arXiv:2607. 13389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) post-training is increasingly used to adapt foundation models for reasoning, planning, and feedback-driven robot-learning pipelines, but constrained post-training resources are often summarized by a single total FLOP budget.
By Patrick Wilhelm, Odej Kao
arXiv:2606. 20008v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has become a central tool for improving the reasoning ability of large language models, but current methods face a trade-off between simplicity and credit assignment.
By Zhewei Kang, Aosong Feng, Sergey Levine, Dawn Song, Xuandong Zhao
arXiv:2609.36393v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) techniques focus on maximizing expected cumulative reward, where each action assumes to take a constant unit...
By Muhang Tian, Sherry Yang
arXiv:2607. 07435v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agents acting on our behalf in the real world (e.
By Bojie Li, Noah Shi
arXiv:2608.20909v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Offline RL methods commonly jointly train the actor and critic, where the critic is used to guide the actor toward higher-value actions. This coupled l...
By Xuyao Lin, Yixiang Shan, Jinru Duan, Tao Yang, Xinyu Zhao, Runyu Lei, Yiming Zhao, Jiaxin Fan, Zongbao Feng, Peng Jia
arXiv:2503. 07869v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Critical learning periods (CLPs) in federated learning (FL) refer to early stages during which low-quality contributions (e.
By Thanh Linh Nguyen, Dinh Thai Hoang, Diep N. Nguyen, Quoc-Viet Pham