arXiv AI

Budget-Adaptive Routing: Skipping the Weak When the Strong Answers Anyway

arXiv:2606. 30919v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Edge-cloud inference collaborations are often designed with a routing estimator that decides whether to offload each frame from weak models at the edge to stronger models in the cloud.

arXiv AI
Sep 17

The Other Half of the Memory Wall: Serving 35B MoEs from SSD with Trained Routing Prediction

The paper introduces Edge0, a streaming mixture‑of‑experts (MoE) inference engine that enables a 35‑billion‑parameter MoE model to run on consumer hardware by predicting routing decisions one token ahead. Edge0 uses a per‑layer prerouter to prefetch the necessary experts from SSD, and an unmerged recovery LoRA trained on the student path to recover quality lost to 4‑bit quantization and routing replacement. On a single 24‑GB machine, Edge0 serves the 35B MoE at 20 tokens per second while keeping peak active memory below 3 GiB, achieving performance close to its fp16 teacher across five public benchmarks.

By Yu Lin, Yiming Wang, Runyuan Cai, Hanze Liu, Xiaodong Zeng
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Calibrate, Then Route: A Measured Study of Learned Request Routing for Disaggregated LLM Serving

The paper evaluates a learned request‑routing policy for disaggregated large‑language‑model serving, where compute‑heavy prefill and memory‑heavy decode stages run on separate GPU pools. Using a discrete‑event simulator and real NVIDIA A40 GPUs, the calibrated router—leveraging prompt length, predicted output length, KV‑cache pressure, and SLO class—outperforms round‑robin, least‑loaded, and length‑based heuristics, achieving the highest mean goodput (0.864) and lowest variance across three mixed, bursty arrival traces. Hardware calibration proves critical, providing a 4.5‑point goodput boost and roughly 40 % of the tail‑latency advantage, and the learned router can match round‑robin performance with one fewer GPU in certain scenarios.

By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
arXiv AI
Jun 29

End-to-End Dynamic Sparsity for Resource-Adaptive LLM Inference

arXiv:2606. 27743v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) inference is typically deployed under a static resource assumption, where models execute a fixed computational graph regardless of the runtime environment.

By Yuhang Chen, Jinhao Duan, Ruichen Zhang, Mingfu Liang, Xiaohan Wei, Yunchen Pu, Fei Tian, Chonglin Sun, Parish Aggarwal, Frank Shyu, Luke Simon, Sandeep Pandey, Tianlong Chen, Xi Liu
arXiv AI
4d ago

TwinRouterBench: Fast Static and Live Dynamic Evaluation for Realistic Agentic LLM Routing

arXiv:2605.18859v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM routing matters most in long-horizon applications such as coding agents, deep research systems, and computer-use agents, where a single u...

By Pei Yang, Wanyi Chen, Tongyun Yang, Pengbin Feng, Jiarong Xing, Wentao Guo, Yuhang Yao, Yuhang Han, Hanchen Li, Xu Wang, Zeyu Wang, Jie Xiao, Anjie Yang, Liang Tian, Lynn Ai, Eric Yang, Tianyu Shi
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Dynamic Expert Quantization for Scalable Mixture-of-Experts Inference

Dynamic Expert Quantization (DynaExq) is a runtime-aware mixed-precision serving system designed for single‑GPU Mixture‑of‑Experts (MoE) inference under a hard high‑bandwidth memory (HBM) envelope. It treats the problem as an online, budget‑constrained precision allocation task, keeping the most frequently used experts at higher precision while relegating the rest to low‑precision fallbacks. By estimating expert hotness from router traces and asynchronously promoting or demoting experts, DynaExq maintains a fully materialized expert set during the forward pass, improving accuracy and throughput compared to static post‑training quantization and offloading/prefetch baselines. whyItMatters":"DynaExq enables efficient deployment of large MoE models on memory‑limited GPUs by dynamically allocating precision based on runtime expert usage, thereby reducing memory footprint and latency while boosting accuracy and throughput."

By Kexin Chu, Dawei Xiang, Zixu Shen, Yiwei Yang, Zecheng Liu, Wei Zhang