arXiv:2607. 10918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning temporal logic specifications from system demonstrations is essential for tasks such as formal verification and controller synthesis, especially in safety-critical domains.
By Parastou Fahim, Constantino Lagoa, R\^omulo Meira-G'oes
arXiv:2605. 29965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The development of temporal extensions of Answer Set Programming (ASP) has led to the emergence of non-monotonic linear-time (TEL), dynamic (DEL), and metric (MEL) temporal equilibrium logics.
By Susana Hahn, Amad\'e Nemes, Javier Romero, Torsten Schaub
arXiv:2602. 06746v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study multi-task reinforcement learning (RL), a setting in which an agent learns a single, universal policy capable of generalising to arbitrary, possibly unseen tasks.
By Alessandro Abate, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Mathias Jackermeier, Jan Kret\'insk\'y, Maximilian Prokop, Christoph Weinhuber
arXiv:2608. 13625v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Signal temporal logic (STL) provides a formal language for specifying real-time properties of real-valued observations, along with a quantitative robustness score for monitoring satisfaction.
By Alper Kamil Bozkurt, Shangtong Zhang, Yuichi Motai
arXiv:2608. 16443v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic (NeSy) Artificial Intelligence aims to integrate Deep Learning (DL) architectures with symbolic reasoning.
By Riccardo Andreoni, Andrei Buliga, Alessandro Daniele, Paolo Felli, Chiara Ghidini, Marco Montali, Massimiliano Ronzani
arXiv:2607. 04784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Defining the reasoning boundaries and ensuring the reliability of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) remains a critical challenge.
By Shide Zhou, Kailong Wang, Ling Shi, Haoyu Wang
arXiv:2605. 02488v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Several applications demand the timely detection of critical situations, such as threats to safety and transparency, over high-velocity streams of symbolic events.
By Periklis Mantenoglou
The paper introduces LLM-Falsifier, a large language model–based method for falsifying cyber‑physical system specifications written in Signal Temporal Logic (STL). By exposing the LLM to semantic cues such as natural‑language names, output trajectories, and critical‑time witnesses, the approach performs smarter, sample‑efficient robustness searches. On ARCH‑COMP benchmarks, LLM‑Falsifier outperforms existing tools across 14 of 21 specifications, requiring fewer simulations to find counterexamples.
By Ali ArjomandBigdeli, Jiawei Zhou, Stanley Bak
arXiv:2608. 13678v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A central goal of robot learning is to enable robots to execute rich instructions specified at runtime.
By Moritz Zoellner, Anastasios Manganaris, Ahmed H. Qureshi, Rohan Paleja
arXiv:2601.07148v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Tool use, such as web search, has become a standard capability even in freely available large language models (LLMs). However, existing bench...
By Zhengxiang Wang, Zeyu Dong
arXiv:2607. 08899v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Signal Temporal Logic (STL) is increasingly used to describe interpretable objectives and constraints for optimal control and learning methods, especially when no target time series data is available.
By Alex Beaudin, Hanna Krasowski, Eric Palanques-Tost, Calin Belta, Murat Arack
arXiv:2608. 16224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: By leveraging large-scale pretraining, LLMs can interpret diverse temporal expressions and question formulations without task-specific training.
By Xinlong Dai, Jinchuan Zhang, Lei Gao, Xinzhe Hu, Yuefeng He, Hui Gao