arXiv:2609.14858v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recursive self-improvement is becoming increasingly vital for autonomous AI agents, where progress hinges on discovering high-value solutions across co...
By Tong Zheng, Xidong Wu, Zheng Zhang, Zhankui He, Chaoyi Zhang, Benjamin Coleman, Ruoqiao Wei, Di Bai, Haolin Liu, Rui Liu, Xue Wang, Yue Zhuan, Wang-Cheng Kang, Renkai Xiang, Heng Huang, Xinwu Cheng, Yunsong Guo
Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks bridge this gap by orchestrating a pool of specialized repair agents inside a verifier-checked refinement loop, but the orchestrator at the centre is itself a prompted frontier LLM, paying a frontier-LLM API call at every refinement step.
arXiv:2610.25946v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Developing coordination policies for complex multi-agent systems relies on either labor-intensive algorithm design or opaque task-specific re...
By Matthias Eder, Pantelis Emmanouil, Vivek Farias, Fabian Fischer, Adam Jozefiak, Tianyi Peng, Thomas Ulz, Raphael Watschinger, Fangyu Wu, Andrew Zheng
arXiv:2602. 13769v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automating heuristic design in complex, experiment-driven domains requires more than iterative mutation of solution algorithms.
By Qi Liu, Ruochen Hao, Can Li, Wanjing Ma
arXiv:2608. 06714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent systems for optimizing prompts, programs, and ML workflows typically rely on explicit outer-loop controllers such as evolutionary search, bandits, or textual-gradient methods.
By Junbo Li, Boyi Liu, Canwen Xu, Yite Wang, Yuxiong He, Zhangyang Wang, Qiang Liu, Zhewei Yao
arXiv:2606. 29082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Would experience designing faster GPU kernels also help close in on a long-standing open mathematical conjecture?
By Young-Jun Lee, Seungone Kim, Minki Kang, Alistair Cheong Liang Chuen, Zerui Chen, Seungho Han, Taehee Jung, Dongyeop Kang
OR-Agent is a multi‑agent research framework that automates heuristic design for optimization problems by structuring heuristic search as a tree‑based workflow with explicit hypothesis generation and systematic backtracking. It introduces a hierarchical, optimization‑inspired reflection system that uses short‑term reflections as verbal gradients, long‑term reflections as verbal momentum, and memory compression as semantic weight decay to guide research dynamics. Experiments on classical combinatorial optimization tasks and simulation‑based cooperative driving scenarios show that OR‑Agent outperforms strong evolutionary search baselines, with all code and data publicly available.
By Qi Liu, Ruochen Hao, Can Li, Wanjing Ma
arXiv:2605. 30719v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study when large language models (LLMs) can serve as effective black-box policy optimizers for reinforcement learning (RL) tasks, i.
By Stephane Hatgis-Kessell, Emma Brunskill
arXiv:2604. 17244v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents for sequential decision-making struggle to produce diverse outputs.
By Priya Gurjar, Md Farhan Ishmam, Kenneth Marino
arXiv:2607. 08894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in multi-step planning tasks, but existing approaches like LATS (Language Agent Tree Search) and ReAct rely heavily on LLM inference during planning, leading to high computational costs and stochastic behavior.
By Maureese Williams, Dymitr Nowicki
Recent systems for optimizing prompts, programs, and ML workflows typically rely on explicit outer-loop controllers such as evolutionary search, bandits, or textual-gradient methods. We ask a fundamentally different question: how much of this search policy can be internalized by a single tool-using agent?
The paper investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) handle the exploration–exploitation trade‑off in Bayesian Optimization, noting that single‑agent LLM approaches suffer from cognitive overload and unstable search dynamics. It proposes a multi‑agent framework that separates strategic policy mediation from tactical candidate generation, allowing explicit, observable, and adjustable exploration–exploitation decisions. Experiments on continuous optimization benchmarks show that this decomposition improves LLM‑mediated search effectiveness.
By Mohammadsina Almasi, Andrea Carbonati, Hadis Anahideh