arXiv:2603.02561v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Attention mechanism remains the defining operator in Transformers since it provides expressive global credit assignment, yet its quadratic co...
By Chenghao Zhang, Chao Feng, Yuanhao Pu, Xunyong Yang, Wenhui Yu, Xiang Li, Chunjie Chen, Kaiqiao Zhan
arXiv:2606. 30139v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Relevance is not permission.
By Minwoo Yu, Young-guk Ha
arXiv:2608. 15877v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search and recommendation serve a shared discovery objective but encode intent differently.
By Rui Wang, Jiazhou Wang, Zheng Wei, Chenglin Lu, Fangcheng Sun, Ivy Sun, Jin Sun, Hui Geng, Lillian Zhang, Chao Yang, Lei Chen, Shahin Sefati, Reem Helou, Joe Zhou, Babak Shakibi, Yiyi Pan, Bi Xue, Hong Yan, Shujian Bu
arXiv:2608. 14021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformer-based sequential recommenders with causal self-attention often rely heavily on the most recent interaction at inference time, but how this behavior is structurally expressed in the representation used for prediction remains unclear.
By Keito Kozaki, Keigo Sakurai, Ren Togo, Takahiro Ogawa, Miki Haseyama
arXiv:2511. 21095v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Early Stage Ranking (ESR) in large-scale recommendation systems is dominated by ''user--item decoupling'' Two Tower architectures, which scale efficiently but cannot capture fine-grained, target-aware user--item interactions directly.
By Juhee Hong, Meng Liu, Shengzhi Wang, Jin Zhou, Xiaoheng Mao, Zhao Zhu, Ruochen Liu, Huihui Cheng, Leon Gao, Christopher Leung, Chandra Mouli Sekar, Yijia Liu, Boyang Yu, Tuan Trieu, Dawei Sun, Jeet Kanjani, Rui Li, Jing Qian, Xuan Cao, Minjie Fan, Mingze Gao
arXiv:2607. 04270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful backbones for recommender systems by reformulating recommendation as a token-level generation task.
By Hongchen Li, Bohao Wang, Jingbang Chen, Weiqin Yang, Hang Pan, Bingde Hu, Can Wang, Jiawei Chen
The paper presents a method for fine‑tuning a large language model (LLM) recommender to generate personalized, non‑harmful explanations for its recommendations. By training two LLM‑judge reward models and using constrained GRPO, the authors achieve a significant increase in the PASS rate for all three criteria, from 0.649 to 0.956 on their own judges and from 0.677 to 0.931 on an independent judge. The fine‑tuned model maintains its original recommendation performance, demonstrating that LLM‑based recommenders can be adapted to complex tasks without loss of effectiveness.
By Jiashu He, Emma Yanyang Kong, JJ Tan, David Fagnan
The paper introduces Warrant, a method that locates and controls the contributions of attention mechanisms to model metrics. Warrant exposes the item‑wise contribution path to the reported metric and applies query‑conditioned permission on that path. Experiments on multiple datasets show that Warrant improves primary metrics in most comparisons, reveals a weak correlation between attention and prediction utility, and demonstrates that learned permission can recover evidence ranking while suppressing distractors.
By Minwoo Yu, Young-guk Ha
arXiv:2606.02737v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Dense retrieval compresses a passage into a single vector, but this compression is positionally skewed: early content dominates the embedding...
By Andrianos Michail, Elias Schuhmacher, Juri Opitz, Simon Clematide, Rico Sennrich
Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful backbones for recommender systems by reformulating recommendation as a token-level generation task. Despite their promise, we identify a pervasive yet underexplored issue: $\textit{Length Bias}$.
arXiv:2607. 27692v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Top-$K$ sparse attention reduces the cost of Softmax and value aggregation by attending to only a small subset of key--value (KV) entries.
By Wenshuai Yao, Wenyong Zhou, Hanyong Shao, Yizhe Chen, Zhiyuan Ning, Yuannuo Feng, Ru Huang, Kechao Tang
arXiv:2606. 02737v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense retrieval models exhibit positional bias: retrieval effectiveness degrades when relevant information appears later in a passage (Zeng et al.
By Andrianos Michail, Elias Schuhmacher, Juri Opitz, Simon Clematide, Rico Sennrich