arXiv:2510. 05342v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a simple and effective method for aligning large language models.
By Hyung Gyu Rho
arXiv:2605. 22876v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing neural solvers for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization Problems (MOCOPs) commonly adopt decomposition-based strategies that scalarize a MOCOP into multiple subproblems associated with distinct weight vectors.
By Xuan Wu, Jinbiao Chen, Yang Li, Lijie Wen, Chunguo Wu, Yuanshu Li, Yubin Xiao, Chunyan Miao, You Zhou, Di Wang
arXiv:2606. 10321v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) trains autoregressive policies to solve routing problems.
By Carlos S. Sep\'ulveda, Gonzalo A. Ruz
arXiv:2607. 27953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) underpin many real-world decisions, but their exponentially large search spaces make high-quality solutions costly to obtain.
By Shengda Gu, Kai Li, Xinyi Ke, Haobo Fu, Yifan Zhang, Jian Cheng
arXiv:2506. 13702v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Single-trajectory preference optimization methods learn from datasets of ((prompt, response, reward)) tuples, offering a practical alternative to pairwise preference learning by directly leveraging scalar feedback.
By Bilal Faye, Hanane Azzag, Mustapha Lebbah
One-step text-to-image generators are attractive for deployment because they generate an image with a single forward pass, but preference finetuning them remains difficult: standard alignment methods often rely on policy likelihoods, denoising trajectories, differentiable reward gradients, or test-time optimization. We propose Drifting Preference Optimization (DrPO), an online preference-finetuning method for deterministic one-step generators.
arXiv:2605. 12288v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a widely used RL-free method for aligning language models from pairwise preferences, but it models preferences over full sequences even though generation is driven by per-token decisions.
By Truong Nguyen, Tien-Phat Nguyen, Linh Ngo Van, Duy Minh Ho Nguyen, Khoa Doan, Trung Le
arXiv:2608. 08878v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across many tasks, but their Key-Value (KV) cache grows linearly with sequence length, creating a severe memory bottleneck for long-context inference.
By Asaad Althoubi
arXiv:2606. 02521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: One-step text-to-image generators are attractive for deployment because they generate an image with a single forward pass, but preference finetuning them remains difficult: standard alignment methods often rely on policy likelihoods, denoising trajectories, differentiable reward gradients, or test-time optimization.
By Zhou Jiang, Yandong Wen, Zhen Liu
arXiv:2605. 25451v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is challenged by both model and data heterogeneity.
By Zili Zhang, Chengxu Yang, Shenglong Zhang, Chenyu Wang, Yufan Zhang, Tuo Dai, Zhouyang Li, Yuhong Ge, Chao Jin, Xin Jin, Yuliang Liu
arXiv:2606. 10706v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Resource constraints increasingly determine what can be trained, fine-tuned, and deployed in large language models (LLMs), yet efficiency is often studied through isolated techniques rather than as an interacting system of limits.
By Vanessa Schmidt, Huy Hoang Nguyen, C\'edric Jung, Shirin Salehi, Anke Schmeink
arXiv:2509. 23982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Preference alignment is a critical step in making Large Language Models (LLMs) useful and aligned with (human) preferences.
By Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli