arXiv Machine Learning

GridSFM: A Foundation Model for Solving AC Optimal Power Flow

GridSFM is a 15‑million‑parameter physics‑inspired graph neural network that serves as a foundation model for solving AC Optimal Power Flow (AC‑OPF) across diverse grid topologies. Pretrained on 54 topologies ranging from 500 to 4,000 buses, it achieves a 2.45 % zero‑shot generation‑cost error on a held‑out 10,000‑bus case and adapts to unseen grids with only 100 solved instances using a physics‑informed fine‑tuning scheme based on Newton’s method. The authors address the disconnected feasible set of AC‑OPF by lifting and relaxing constraints with logarithmically penalized slacks, proving the resulting elastic feasible set is contractible and that solutions can be projected back onto the original feasible set.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

GENCO - A Unified Neural Solver Embedded in a Development Framework for Steady-State Grid Analysis

arXiv:2608. 09921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models are transforming business workflows and boosting productivity, yet they remain largely absent from engineering domains such as power system analysis, where strict physical consistency must be enforced.

By Alban Puech, Matteo Mazzonelli, Tamara R. Govindasamy, Mangaliso Mngomezulu, H\'ector Maeso-Garc\'ia, Thomas Tolhurst, Javad Bayazi, Ali Moeini, Naomi Simumba, Celia Cintas, David Nelischer, Romeo Kienzler, Jonas Weiss, Anna Varbella, Florian D\"orfler, Gabriela Hug, Martin Mevissen, Juan Bernab\'e-Moreno, Fran\c{c}ois Mirall\`es, Hendrik F. Hamann, Etienne Vos, Thomas Brunschwiler
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Scalable Self-Supervised Learning for Multiphase AC-OPF in Distribution Systems with Topology Reconfiguration

The paper introduces Penalty + Sequential Linearized Feasibility Seeking (SLFS), a self‑supervised learning framework for solving multiphase AC optimal power flow (AC‑OPF) in distribution systems with topology reconfiguration. SLFS trains directly from the AC‑OPF objective and constraints using a differentiable fixed‑point power flow solver, avoiding the need for labeled optimal solutions. It achieves negligible optimality gaps and near‑zero constraint violations on IEEE feeders up to 8,500 nodes, delivering up to three orders of magnitude speedups over IPOPT while maintaining robustness to large distributional shifts.

By Hoang T. Nguyen, Shaohui Liu, Reetam Sen Biswas, Varsha Pendyala, Nurali Virani, Deepjyoti Deka, Priya L. Donti
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

PF$\Delta$: A Benchmark Dataset for Power Flow under Load, Generation, and Topology Variations

arXiv:2510. 22048v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Power flow (PF) calculations are the backbone of real-time grid operations, across workflows such as contingency analysis (where repeated PF evaluations assess grid security under outages) and topology optimization (which involves PF-based searches over combinatorially large action spaces).

By Ana K. Rivera, Anvita Bhagavathula, Alvaro Carbonero, Priya Donti
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 16

Scaling Laws for Physics-Aware ACOPF Surrogate Learning

The paper investigates how physics‑aware objectives, specifically the augmented Lagrangian (AL), affect the constraint satisfaction of learning‑based surrogates for AC optimal power flow (ACOPF). By sweeping model and dataset sizes under both mean‑squared error (MSE) and AL training, the authors find that both objectives improve following power‑law trends, but AL yields a slower growth in constraint violation with network size. On matched hardware, AL reduces violation by nearly 30× for an order of magnitude more training time, with negligible added memory.

By Yijiang Li, Emon Dey, Stefano Fenu, Massimiliano Lupo Pasini, Teja Kuruganti, Kibaek Kim
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 15

MxGPS: Multiplex Graph Transformers for a Power Grid Foundation Model

Single-task fine-tuning of graph neural networks (GNNs) for power grid problems exhibits a systematic failure mode: models that achieve the lowest in-distribution error degrade the most under topology shift. We term this topology overfitting: the tendency of task-specific gradient signals to encode relational structure particular to the training topologies rather than the underlying physics, causing models to fail on unseen grids despite strong in-distribution performance.