arXiv AI

SetGo: Metadata Readiness for Scientific AI Datasets

arXiv:2607. 22677v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific datasets intended for AI use require both computational readiness for model training and metadata readiness for discovery, sharing, and reuse.

arXiv AI
Jul 7

Automated Data Readiness for Scientific AI

arXiv:2607. 02771v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Leadership computing facilities steward large-scale scientific datasets that routinely require substantial transformation before serving as AI training data.

By Sean R. Wilkinson, Valentine G. Anantharaj, Jong Youl Choi, Ketan Maheshwari, Marshall McDonnell, Massimiliano Lupo Pasini, Polina Shpilker, Renan Souza, Patrick Widener, Sarp Oral, Wesley Brewer
arXiv AI
Jul 20

SciForge: An AI-Native, Multimodal Workbench for Scientific Discovery

arXiv:2607. 16038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific work increasingly spans heterogeneous artifacts -- papers, code, datasets, scientific file formats, model outputs, figures, manuscripts, and team decisions -- yet general-purpose AI assistants rarely preserve these objects as a coherent, auditable research state.

By SciForge Team, Zhangyang Gao, Minghao Fang, Yifei Liu, Hanhui Yang, Xinyu Gu, Shixiang Tang, Siqi Sun, Lei Bai, Cheng Tan, Mengdi Liu, Hao Wu, Shuizhou Chen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 5

CheMLFlow: An Open-Source Platform for Cheminformatics and Materials Informatics Applications

CheMLFlow is an open-source platform for building and executing end-to-end, high-throughput, and agentic workflows for scientific and technological applications. CheMLFlow targets a common bottleneck in scientific machine learning development, where researchers often need to assemble data acquisition, curation, representation, model training, validation, screening, interpretation, and reporting into a reproducible pipeline, even when their primary research contribution concerns only one stage.

arXiv AI
Jul 7

LLMoxie: Exploring Agentic AI for Scientific Software Development

arXiv:2607. 02703v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for AI coding agents.

By Landung Setiawan, Anant Mittal, Cordero Core, Anshul Tambay, Carlos Garcia Jurado Suarez, David A. C. Beck, Andrew J. Connolly, Vani Mandava
arXiv AI
Jun 12

TerraBench: Can Agents Reason Over Heterogeneous Earth-System Data?

arXiv:2606. 13148v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Climate and environmental decision-making increasingly requires reasoning across heterogeneous inputs, including gridded physical data, satellite imagery, geospatial context, and simulator outputs.

By Dat Tien Nguyen, Thao Nguyen, Fadillah Adamsyah Maani, Huy M. Le, Muhammad Umer Sheikh, Numan Saeed, Muhammad Haris Khan, Salman Khan
arXiv AI
Jun 12

Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales

arXiv:2606. 12736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly being developed to accelerate scientific discovery, yet their practical capabilities in real research settings remain poorly understood.

By Tianyu Liu, Allen Xin Wang, Antonia Panescu, Lisa Xinyi Chen, Wenxin Long, Xinyu Wei, Yueqian Jing, Ziyao Zeng, Jihang Chen, Sihan Jiang, Ziqing Wang, Siyi Gu, Siyu Chen, Xinyang Hu, Haoran Shao, Leqi Xu, Wangjie Zheng, Zhiyuan Cao, Ada Fang, Botao Yu, Kunyang Sun, Rex Ying, Arman Cohan, Qingyu Chen, Lingzhou Xue, Kaize Ding, Yuanqi Du, Wengong Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Marinka Zitnik, James Zou, Hua Xu, Hongyu Zhao
arXiv AI
Jul 14

Are LLMs Ready for Scientific Discovery? A Capability-Oriented Benchmark for AI Scientists

arXiv:2607. 11079v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing benchmarks for scientific data analysis evaluate LLMs primarily on code execution or workflow completion, overlooking that scientific analysis serves to support distinct types of scientific claims: hypothesis exploration, statistical inference, mechanistic explanation, each with different assumptions and validity criteria.

By Chuhan Shi, Xiaoquan Ren, Sicheng Song, Haobo Li, Rui Sheng, Yushi Sun