The paper introduces VoxPrivacy, a benchmark for assessing interactional privacy in Speech Language Models (SLMs). It evaluates models on a 32‑hour bilingual dataset across three difficulty tiers, revealing that most open‑source SLMs perform near random on conditional privacy decisions and even strong closed‑source systems struggle with proactive privacy inference. The authors also validate these findings on a real‑speech subset and show that fine‑tuning on a 4,000‑hour training set can improve privacy‑preserving capabilities while maintaining robustness.
By Yuxiang Wang, Hongyu Liu, Dekun Chen, Xueyao Zhang, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2609.13195v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have recently shown strong capabilities in speech understanding and question answering (QA), but they also inherit...
By Zhe Liu
arXiv:2603.07551v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Recent zero-shot Text-to-Speech (TTS) systems can clone previously unseen voices from only a few seconds of audio. We formulate Speech Genera...
By Thanathai Lertpetchpun, Thanapat Trachu, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Shrikanth Narayanan
arXiv:2607. 03985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advanced neural technologies in speech synthesis and voice conversion (VC) have introduced severe risks to personal privacy, necessitating robust Speaker Anonymization Systems (SAS).
By Meiying Melissa Chen, Anastasia Kuznetsova, Zhenyu Wang, Zhiyao Duan
The paper introduces a two‑stage speech anonymization framework that preserves both linguistic content and acoustic identity. It replaces personally identifiable information using a generative editing model and applies a flow‑matching anonymization technique (F3‑VA) to create diverse, distinct anonymized speakers. The authors evaluate privacy with speaker verification metrics and utility by training ASR, TTS, and SER models from scratch, showing stronger privacy protection with minimal utility loss compared to existing baselines.
By Yunchong Xiao, Yuxiang Zhao, Ziyang Ma, Shuai Wang, Kai Yu, Jiachun Liao, Xie Chen
arXiv:2606. 05678v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have become widely used for multilingual speech-to-text transcription.
By Yifan Liao, Zongmin Zhang, Zhen Sun, Yuhui Sun, Xinhu Zheng, Xinlei He
arXiv:2609.13393v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deep joint source-channel coding (DeepJSCC) transmits learned semantic features efficiently but can leak sensitive attributes such as gender, race, o...
By Rami Eid, Maria Slim, Mariette Awad, Hadi Sarieddeen
arXiv:2606. 05004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue.
By Peihua Mai, Xuanrong Gao, Youlong Ding, Xianglong Du, Wei Liu, Yan Pang
The paper examines how supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of large language models can leak personally identifiable information (PII) when the fine-tuning data contains user-provided sensitive details. It introduces COVA, a coverage-aware decoding algorithm that improves targeted PII reconstruction from SFT models, especially when an adversary has limited contextual knowledge about a target. Experiments on medical and legal Q&A datasets show that even small proprietary SFT datasets can lead to significant privacy leakage via PII reconstruction.
By Sae Furukawa, Alina Oprea
SpeechLLMs used in professional settings often undergo domain customisation through prompts or fine‑tuning, which can inadvertently cause the model to transcribe phonetically similar words from its context or training data, leaking private information. The authors systematically investigate this overlooked privacy risk, creating benchmarks to measure leakage rates for both prompting and fine‑tuning, and find that both mechanisms cause measurable leakage that compounds when combined. They evaluate a prompt‑level mitigation strategy and analyse the accuracy‑leakage trade‑off, concluding that fine‑tuning without context prompts offers the best balance between performance and privacy.
By Maike Z\"ufle, Jan Niehues
arXiv:2606. 31991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement.
By Wojciech {\L}apacz, Stanis{\l}aw Pawlak
Large Language Models (LLMs) raise growing concerns about privacy leakage and copyright compliance. Membership inference is a key tool for assessing such risks, but existing studies mainly focus on whether specific samples or sample-based data units are used for training.