arXiv:2610.08085v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Speech-LLMs often exhibit prompt overfitting, where models solely trained on automatic speech recognition (ASR) instruction fail to generalize to new i...
By Hemant Yadav, Sunayana Sitaram, Roger Zimmermann, Rajiv Ratn Shah
Connecting a pre-trained speech encoder to a Large Language Model (LLM) is the standard architecture for building Speech LLMs. However, a structural misalignment exists between the encoder and the LLM.
arXiv:2607. 06831v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech-to-text alignment means finding the temporal boundaries of each word in the audio.
By Albert Zeyer, Ralf Schl\"uter, Hermann Ney
arXiv:2606. 09234v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-speech (TTS) systems typically adopt a cascaded pipeline consisting of a speech tokenizer, an autoregressive large language model (LLM), and a diffusion based flow-matching (FM) model, with these components trained independently.
By Changfeng Gao, Yong Ren, Jun Yuan, Ye Bai, Zhao You, ShiDong Shang
arXiv:2610.08994v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Speech large language models (speech LLMs) perform well on automatic speech recognition (ASR) when sufficient paired speech-text data is available, b...
By Ryo Magoshi, Shinsuke Sakai, Tatsuya Kawahara
SPAR-K is a scheduled periodic alternating early‑exit framework for interleaved spoken language models that reduces decoding depth for speech tokens while maintaining quality. It lets most speech positions exit at a fixed intermediate layer and inserts periodic full‑depth refresh steps to counter distribution shift. Experiments on Step‑Audio‑2‑mini and GLM‑4‑Voice show up to 11 % depth reduction with less than 0.82 % drop in question‑answering accuracy and negligible impact on MOS and WER.
By Hsiao-Ying Huang, Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi Lee
arXiv:2605. 28066v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in text embedding, yet current adaptation methods like LoRA face significant bottlenecks in computational efficiency and cross-architecture transferability.
By Yu-Che Tsai, Kuan-Yu Chen, Yuan-Hao Chen, Yu-Han Chang, Ching-Yu Tsai, Yu-Hsiang Chuang, Shou-De Lin
arXiv:2509.10452v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Pretrained automatic speech recognition (ASR) models such as Whisper perform well but still need domain adaptation to handle unseen parlance....
By Akshat Pandey, Karun Kumar, Raphael Tang
arXiv:2609.05871v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Audio-conditioned language models often underuse acoustic cues such as prosody, emotion, and non-speech sounds, raising the question of whether ASR-s...
By Song-ha Jo, Sehyun Lee, Soyoon Kim, Jaesik Choi, Sanghyuk Choi
The paper introduces Local Prototype Reconstruction (LPR), a lightweight regularizer that encourages bridge embeddings in speech‑to‑LLM systems to stay close to the frozen LLM’s input‑embedding neighbourhoods. By measuring lexical manifold compatibility with a fixed, head‑free, timestamp‑free diagnostic, the authors show that next‑word prediction and sentence‑level contrastive pretraining do not fully capture token‑level lexical compatibility. Experiments on multilingual ASR and speech translation demonstrate that LPR improves transfer, especially for translation and low‑resource adaptation, and that the diagnostic correlates with downstream gains across objectives.
By Xinnian Zhao, Chia-Hua Wu, Pu Wang, Hugo Van Hamme
arXiv:2603. 05121v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech Large Language Models route speech encoder representations into an LLM decoder that typically accounts for over 90% of total parameters.
By Adel Moumen, Guangzhi Sun, Philip C Woodland
arXiv:2608. 13817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human speech production is constrained by physiology, giving rise to characteristic temporal structure on acoustic signals.
By Tom\'as Andrade Weber