Hugging Face Trending Papers

DirectSpeech2LLM: A Simple End-to-End Framework to Mitigate Prompt Overfitting in Speech-LLMs

arXiv AI
Jun 9

End-to-End Training for Discrete Token LLM based TTS System

arXiv:2606. 09234v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-speech (TTS) systems typically adopt a cascaded pipeline consisting of a speech tokenizer, an autoregressive large language model (LLM), and a diffusion based flow-matching (FM) model, with these components trained independently.

By Changfeng Gao, Yong Ren, Jun Yuan, Ye Bai, Zhao You, ShiDong Shang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

SPAR-K: Scheduled Periodic Alternating Early Exit for Spoken Language Models

SPAR-K is a scheduled periodic alternating early‑exit framework for interleaved spoken language models that reduces decoding depth for speech tokens while maintaining quality. It lets most speech positions exit at a fixed intermediate layer and inserts periodic full‑depth refresh steps to counter distribution shift. Experiments on Step‑Audio‑2‑mini and GLM‑4‑Voice show up to 11 % depth reduction with less than 0.82 % drop in question‑answering accuracy and negligible impact on MOS and WER.

By Hsiao-Ying Huang, Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi Lee
arXiv AI
Jun 10

PromptEmbedder: Efficient and Transferable Text Embedding via Dual-LLM Soft Prompting

arXiv:2605. 28066v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in text embedding, yet current adaptation methods like LoRA face significant bottlenecks in computational efficiency and cross-architecture transferability.

By Yu-Che Tsai, Kuan-Yu Chen, Yuan-Hao Chen, Yu-Han Chang, Ching-Yu Tsai, Yu-Hsiang Chuang, Shou-De Lin
arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago

Local Prototype Reconstruction for Text-Compatible Speech-to-LLM Bridge Pretraining

The paper introduces Local Prototype Reconstruction (LPR), a lightweight regularizer that encourages bridge embeddings in speech‑to‑LLM systems to stay close to the frozen LLM’s input‑embedding neighbourhoods. By measuring lexical manifold compatibility with a fixed, head‑free, timestamp‑free diagnostic, the authors show that next‑word prediction and sentence‑level contrastive pretraining do not fully capture token‑level lexical compatibility. Experiments on multilingual ASR and speech translation demonstrate that LPR improves transfer, especially for translation and low‑resource adaptation, and that the diagnostic correlates with downstream gains across objectives.

By Xinnian Zhao, Chia-Hua Wu, Pu Wang, Hugo Van Hamme