arXiv:2606. 07801v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal reasoning requires a path that retains integrity over a wide range of constraints, from visual grounding to logic consistency.
arXiv:2603. 06652v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning has recently improved the reasoning ability of Large Language Models and Multimodal LLMs, yet prevailing reward designs emphasise final-answer correctness and consequently tolerate process hallucinations--cases where models reach the right answer while misperceiving visual evidence.
arXiv:2510.01719v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluation of multimodal reasoning models is typically reduced to a single accuracy score, implicitly treating reasoning as a unitary capability. W...
arXiv:2609.39168v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), yet existing...
The paper introduces VIG (Visual Information Gain), an information‑theoretic reward that evaluates each token in a multimodal chain‑of‑thought by measuring how much the image reduces its predictive uncertainty. VIG is computed online using two forward passes—one with and one without the image—eliminating the need for reference chains or external annotations. Experiments on six multimodal reasoning benchmarks and multiple Qwen3‑VL‑Thinking model sizes show that VIG consistently improves the accuracy–efficiency trade‑off, demonstrating that efficient multimodal reasoning arises from increasing visual information density rather than merely limiting chain length.
arXiv:2512.14691v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern multimodal generative models can synthesize visually compelling images and videos, but it remains unclear whether this visual fluency reflec...
arXiv:2606. 15160v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have improved considerably in recent years.
The paper introduces LIFT, a lightweight vector‑intervention technique that transfers reasoning capability from a base large language model (LLM) to a vision‑language model (VLM) without retraining the VLM backbone. LIFT defines Reasoning Vectors as differences in hidden states between a reasoning path with an explicit trace and a solver path without it, and injects these vectors into the VLM’s language‑side activations. Experiments on two VLMs across six reasoning benchmarks show that vectors derived from the base LLM consistently outperform those derived from the aligned VLM, indicating that the base LLM is a more effective source for recovering degraded reasoning. "whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that a simple, frozen‑backbone intervention can partially restore reasoning abilities in multimodal models, highlighting the value of leveraging the original language model’s reasoning power."
CRYSTAL is a diagnostic benchmark comprising 6,372 multimodal reasoning instances that assess models through verifiable intermediate steps. It introduces two metrics—Match F1 and Ordered Match F1—to evaluate step-level precision, recall, and order. The benchmark, built via a Delphi-inspired pipeline with four independent MLLMs, reveals systematic failures in current models, such as cherry‑picking and disordered reasoning, and proposes a Causal Process Reward and CPR‑Curriculum to improve reasoning performance.
PEAR is an adaptive advantage reshaping method designed to improve perception and exploration in large vision‑language models. It builds on visual dependency as a base signal and adds an entropy‑based exploration gain only at high‑entropy positions, giving larger gains where visual dependency is lower. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑VL‑3B/7B demonstrate that PEAR outperforms baseline methods across multimodal reasoning benchmarks and achieves leading results on textual reasoning and general multimodal tasks.
arXiv:2606. 31825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models have shown great promise in clinical image reasoning, but existing post-training pipelines remain predominantly outcome-centric, relying on final answer correctness or sequence-level preferences.
arXiv:2602. 02465v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Frontier models are transitioning from multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that merely ingest visual information to unified multimodal models (UMMs) capable of native interleaved generation.
arXiv:2608. 08326v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective approach for improving multimodal reasoning.