MR‑IQA‑2 introduces an actor‑editor‑judge framework that separates reasoning from rating in image quality assessment. The actor generates quality reasoning, the editor modifies the image based on identified factors, and a frozen judge compares the original and edited images to provide reflective supervision. Fine‑grained credit assignment allows distinct supervision signals for reasoning and rating, achieving competitive human‑aligned ratings while offering richer, faithful visual understanding.
arXiv:2607. 12375v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Image Quality Assessment (IQA) in open-world environments remains challenging due to limited generalization and interpretability.
Recent advances in unified multimodal models have significantly improved text-guided image editing abilities. In particular, models such as Nano-Banana-Pro and GPT-Image-2 demonstrate emerging capabilities in multi-source image editing (MIE), including tasks such as object synthesis, person-background composition, and cross-image style fusion.
arXiv:2606. 16082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been increasingly adopted for Image Quality Assessment (IQA).
arXiv:2606. 08016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current image editing software often hinges on fixed filters or expert tuning, leaving a gap between amateur users' intent and outcomes.
arXiv:2608. 09111v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI video generation has advanced rapidly and entered widespread commercial use.
arXiv:2606. 26904v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video reasoning language models implicitly assume that every input frame is equally reliable.
AI video generation has advanced rapidly and entered widespread commercial use. As a result, quality differences among videos produced by state-of-the-art AI video generation models~(AIVGMs) have become increasingly difficult to discern using conventional evaluation criteria, such as visual fidelity and semantic instruction following.
arXiv:2608. 07565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conversational assistants increasingly recommend follow-up edits to help users continue a task.
arXiv:2601. 02918v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is a long-standing problem in computer vision.
arXiv:2606. 17888v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has extended from purely linguistic domains to multimodal scenarios; however, existing approaches often treat visual inputs as homogeneous or auxiliary signals, failing to capture the intricate and sample-specific dependencies between text and images in mathematical problem-solving.
arXiv:2606. 00931v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Instruction-guided image editing is becoming a general interface for visual work, yet existing benchmarks still focus largely on narrow appearance edits and do not fully capture the diversity of real-image tasks in professional workflows.
ReasonEdit is a new editor for vision‑language models that allows users to provide reasoning explanations during the editing process. It stores human reasoning in a codebook and retrieves relevant facts at inference time using a topology‑balanced multimodal embedding approach inspired by network science. Experiments on four VLMs and multiple rationale‑based visual question answering datasets show that incorporating human reasoning leads to state‑of‑the‑art editing performance and better generalization.