arXiv Machine Learning

A Defense of the Quadratic Model

arXiv:2607. 21716v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Due to the complexity of neural network loss landscapes, optimization theory is forced to rely on idealized models, and there is generally a tradeoff between how theoretically tractable the model is, and how accurately it describes the true optimization dynamics.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

On the Implicit Flatness Bias of Sharpness-Aware Minimization: A Linear Stability Analysis with Quantitative Hyperparameter Bounds

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) improves generalization by seeking parameters whose loss is robust to local adversarial perturbations, but the quantitative mechanism underlying its implicit bias toward flat minima remains unclear. In particular, the perturbation radius $ρ$ is typically treated as an isolated tuning parameter, despite defining the neighborhood in which SAM measures sharpness.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

Zeroth-Order Optimization at the Edge of Stability

arXiv:2604. 14669v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Zeroth-order (ZO) methods are widely used when gradients are unavailable or prohibitively expensive, including black-box learning and memory-efficient fine-tuning of large models, yet their optimization dynamics in deep learning remain underexplored.

By Minhak Song, Liang Zhang, Bingcong Li, Niao He, Michael Muehlebach, Sewoong Oh
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

The Road Taken: The Role of Optimizers at the Edge of Stability

The paper investigates the "edge of stability" phenomenon in deep learning, where Hessian eigenvalues remain stable above a classically predicted unstable threshold. It shows that many first‑order optimizers, including gradient descent, can violate this stability bound by up to a factor of 21.1, and that this deviation depends systematically on the optimizer used. The authors propose a new stability threshold based on the directional Hessian and gradient‑alignment score, which removes optimizer‑dependent offsets and offers consistent predictions while providing diagnostic tools to understand how optimizers balance temporal and spatial budgets.

By Jaerin Lee, Kyoung Mu Lee
arXiv AI
Jun 26

Error-Conditioned Neural Solvers

arXiv:2606. 27354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution.

By Haina Jiang, Liam Wang, Peng-Chen Chen, Min Seop Kwak, Seungryong Kim, Brian Bell, Jeong Joon Park
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 16

How the Hessian-Spectrum of Neural Networks Depends on Data

arXiv:2607. 13631v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Hessian matrix is an important quantity of interest when it comes to studying the loss landscape and optimization dynamics in deep learning, as well as designing measures of generalization, second-order learning algorithms, etc.

By Jasraj Singh, Enea Monzio Compagnoni, Antonio Orvieto
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

AYLA: Architecting a loss landscape in shallow neural networks to accelerate feature recovery

AYLA is a loss reparameterization framework that applies a sigmoid‑controlled power‑law transformation to the empirical loss, dynamically adjusting gradient magnitudes without changing stationary points or optimal solutions. By reshaping optimization trajectories, AYLA accelerates descent in flat or saddle‑dominated regions and stabilizes late‑stage training, leading to improved feature recovery in two‑layer tanh networks on synthetic Gaussian data. Experiments show enhanced weight alignment, neuron similarity, activation correlation, and richer internal representations, while mitigating rank collapse and promoting a transition from lazy to active feature‑learning regimes.

By Behnam Gheshlaghi, Shahin Atakishiyev
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Memory Savings at What Cost? A Study of Alternatives to Backpropagation

arXiv:2506. 21833v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Forward-mode automatic differentiation (FmAD) and zero-order (ZO) optimization are increasingly proposed as memory-efficient, backpropagation-free alternatives for large language model (LLM) fine-tuning, yet their benefits are typically evaluated only against standard backpropagation (BP), omitting memory-efficient variants such as activation checkpointing.

By Kunjal Panchal, Sunav Choudhary, Yuriy Brun, Hui Guan