The paper introduces Contrastive Set-Difference (CSD), a pruning method that targets neurons involved in redundant reasoning by contrasting activations on long versus short correct solutions. CSD is combined with an extended preference-based chain-of-thought compression that also considers problems a pruned model always or never solves. Applied to a 7B model, the approach reduces thinking tokens by 8–22% on math benchmarks while maintaining accuracy within 0.5 points compared to traditional pruning and compression pipelines.
By Tao Jing, Chen Kang, Feifei Zhai, Pengyuan Liu, Dong Yu
arXiv:2607. 11089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting.
By Mohammed Ehab, Aymane El Gadarri, Vivek F. Farias, Adam Jozefiak, Ciamac C. Moallemi
The paper revisits the impact of pruning on large language models (LLMs) during test-time scaling (TTS). While prior work found that structured pruning degrades reasoning performance, this study shows that unstructured pruning—removing only specific redundant weights—can actually improve TTS performance on reasoning benchmarks for models s1.1-7B and Qwen3-8B, sometimes surpassing the full-weight models. The authors also examine how different layer-wise sparsity allocation strategies affect these outcomes.
By Ocean Monjur, Shahriar Kabir Nahin, Anshuman Chhabra
OBC‑Prune introduces an outcome‑based calibration approach for pruning large reasoning models, focusing on the causal importance of each reasoning sentence rather than uniform activation salience. By pairing correct and incorrect rollouts and using intervention‑based analysis, it assigns per‑token weights that guide one‑shot pruning methods such as SparseGPT, Wanda, and ALPS. Experiments on DeepSeek‑R1‑Distill‑Qwen models show consistent accuracy gains and shorter reasoning traces across multiple benchmarks at 40‑50% sparsity.
By Ha Lan Nguyen, Huy Hoang Tran, Trac-Duy Tran, Dung D. Le
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. However, these models often exhibit "computational overthinking," generating redundant reasoning steps that increase latency and cost without improving accuracy.
Continuous-Utility Direct Preference Optimization (CU‑DPO) replaces binary preference labels with continuous scores to better capture fine‑grained reasoning quality. The framework aligns language models to multiple prompt‑based cognitive strategies, proving a θ(K log K) sample‑complexity improvement and convergence to an entropy‑regularized utility‑maximizing policy. A two‑stage pipeline—strategy selection via best‑vs‑all comparisons and execution refinement using margin‑stratified pairs—yields significant gains on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and causal reasoning benchmarks.
By Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Muhammad Umer, Emily Fox
The paper introduces Planned Test-Time Scaling (PTTS), a method that replaces independent sampling of reasoning branches with a coordinated joint policy. PTTS uses a planner to generate distinct solution outlines for each branch and an executor to produce full solutions, thereby improving coverage of complementary reasoning modes. Two variants—PTTS‑ZS (zero‑shot) and PTTS‑RL (reinforcement‑learned)—demonstrate significant gains on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, with PTTS‑RL achieving up to a 13.4‑point improvement in pass@64 over repeated sampling.
By Xueqing Wu, Langxing Bai, Hritik Bansal, Po-Nien Kung, Shuo Li, Hao Liu, Nanyun Peng, Kai-Wei Chang
arXiv:2510.01581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Recent thinking models are capable of solving complex reasoning tasks by scaling test-time compute, but this scaling should be allocated in l...
By Joykirat Singh, Justin Chih-Yao Chen, Archiki Prasad, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Akshay Nambi, Mohit Bansal
arXiv:2606.29985v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Diversity in LLM mathematical reasoning is critical for exploration, but common diversity metrics mostly capture surface-level variation rather tha...
By Sangmook Lee, Minbeom Kim, Jeonghye Kim, Dohyung Kim, Sojeong Rhee, Kyomin Jung
arXiv:2604. 06465v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reasoning models achieve strong performance on complex problems by leveraging long chains of thought, but this deliberate reasoning incurs substantial inference-time cost.
By Mario Iacobelli, Adrian Robert Minut, Tommaso Mencattini, Donato Crisostomi, Andrea Santilli, Iacopo Masi, Emanuele Rodol\`a
arXiv:2607. 19962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking due to redundant verification steps.
By Xinbang Dai, Zheyu Xin, Huikang Hu, Lin Ren, Rihui Jin, Guohui Xiao, Guilin Qi, Kuicai Dong, Zhaocheng Du, Yuyang Zhang
The paper introduces HOPE, a second‑order pruning method for Mixture‑of‑Experts language models that accounts for cooperative interactions between experts. Unlike first‑order methods such as REAP, HOPE derives an objective that provably bounds pruning error and is shown to outperform baselines across three large MoE models, multiple calibration sets, and diverse benchmarks, especially at high pruning rates and on agentic tasks. The results demonstrate that preserving expert interactions allows aggressive compression with minimal performance loss on complex workloads.
By Alex M. Tseng, Prannay Kaul, Luca Zancato, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto