arXiv:2606. 01838v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic language model systems alternate between two structurally distinct step types: structured tool calls (short, deterministic, low perplexity) and open-ended planning/reasoning steps (long, complex, high perplexity).
By Prateek Kumar Sikdar
The paper presents a rigor‑matched audit comparing two periodic‑step, search‑based layer‑skipping methods for efficient large language model inference: a confidence‑gated early‑exit baseline (ConfLayers) and a self‑speculative decoding approach (SWIFT). Across two Qwen2.5 model scales and tasks (GSM8K reasoning and CNN/DailyMail summarization), SWIFT consistently outperforms ConfLayers in accuracy and, after separating search overhead, achieves faster true inference speed in most settings. The study also evaluates two trained‑routing methods (LayerRoute and LayerDrop), finding modest speedups but significantly lower accuracy, especially for LayerRoute on GSM8K at 1.5B.
By Prateek Kumar Sikdar, Arpan Ghosh
ACE introduces a training‑free, calibration‑free framework for adaptive expert skipping in Mixture‑of‑Experts LLMs. It combines a Global Spectral Proxy that estimates global transformation capacity with a Router‑Conditioned Refinement that builds expert‑specific direction prototypes, enabling the model to skip low‑contribution experts while always keeping the top‑1 expert. Offline computation of expert statistics leaves only lightweight table lookups during inference, and experiments on three MoE‑based LLMs show ACE outperforms static and dynamic baselines, especially at high skipping ratios.
By Zukang Xu, Zhixiong Zhao, Xing Hu, Jiangyong Yu, Houji Wen, Jun Li, Zhe Jiang, Dawei Yang
The study re‑examines a reported advantage of a routed ternary (1.58‑bit) language model over a full‑precision transformer at 60K parameters. By running controlled experiments with multiple seeds and a fixed training recipe, the authors find that the apparent benefit largely stems from the choice of baseline model shape rather than the ternary architecture itself. While the routed model does outperform other shapes at a larger 130M‑byte budget, its advantage diminishes when a plain gated diagonal‑SSM block is used, and the ternary penalty varies with architecture and quantization details.
By Gautam Veldanda
arXiv:2608. 07890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models decouple total parameters from per-token compute, but deployment still requires storing every expert.
By Ali Janati, Kaoutar El Maghraoui, Xinyi Luo, Wenyuan Shen, Owen Zou, Yankai Mao
The paper examines whether expert‑routing statistics from a Mixture‑of‑Experts language model can inform layer‑wise mixed‑precision quantization of routed‑expert feed‑forward networks. By building a routing‑capture pipeline for Qwen‑3.6‑35B‑A3B, the authors derive a composite sensitivity score and use coordinate descent to allocate bits per layer under a fixed budget. Experiments across flat, steep, and random allocation regimes show that routing‑guided reallocation does not outperform a uniform baseline, suggesting that routing behavior is an unreliable proxy for true quantization cost.
By Yifan Liu
arXiv:2606. 06564v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Block-level residual routing makes learned residual aggregation practical by routing over block summaries, but each summary compresses an ordered sequence of attention and MLP updates into one cumulative vector.
By Kehan Wang
The paper investigates training‑free pruning of Mixture‑of‑Experts (MoE) models, focusing on how to handle the computation when a router selects a pruned expert. It compares replacement operators from three families on several models (OLMoE, DeepSeek‑V2‑Lite, Moonlight, Granite) while keeping the pruning mask fixed, and introduces a new operator called the tilted novice. The study finds that no single operator consistently dominates, with performance varying by model, pruning level, and evaluation metric, and it proposes a five‑item checklist for reporting results.
By Ezza Ali, Sehrish Bibi, Momina Moetesum, Faisal Shafait
arXiv:2609.08189v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Dynamic layer routing reduces the inference cost of Large Language Models (LLMs) by learning to skip layers for individual tokens. Existing methods, ho...
By Hongjin Lin, Wentao Wan, Keze Wang
The paper introduces LOOM, a method for scaling looped mixture‑of‑experts (MoE) Transformers beyond the typical two‑loop limit. LOOM addresses two key obstacles: it stabilizes deep recurrence by bounding residual variance and re‑injecting the input embedding, and it prevents expert selection collapse by using per‑loop routers and a looping residual to maintain computational diversity. Experiments on 100 M–1.7 B parameter models show stable scaling to 9–12 loops, with significant perplexity reductions and zero‑shot accuracy gains under near‑iso‑FLOP conditions.
By Di He, Pengxiang Li, Da Chang, Qingyan Meng, Lu Yin, Shiwei Liu
arXiv:2607. 24665v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern large language models scale successfully by pairing capacity growth with efficiency, keeping per-token and deployment costs under control as capacity grows.
By Yanhao Jia, Jiepeng Wang, Haibin Huang, Chi Zhang, Erik Cambria, Xuelong Li
arXiv:2606. 02559v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training compression of Large Language Models (LLMs) removes entire architectural components, either deleting them or replacing them with fitted modules.
By Elia Cunegatti, Marcus Vukojevic, Erik Nielsen, Giovanni Iacca