The paper investigates the use of looped language models for compositional tool calling, where models must coordinate multiple API calls and maintain state across interactions. Experiments on API-Bank, BFCL, and NESTful show that recurrent computation generally improves compositional and dependency-aware tool use, with accuracy increasing as recurrent depth grows. Adaptive inference offers a better compute‑performance trade‑off by allocating extra computation only when necessary.
arXiv:2609.36636v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped language models (LoopLMs) increase computational depth through parameter sharing, offering a path to scale inference computation without adding...
arXiv:2608. 05124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long context reasoning in large language models (LLMs) is usually constrained by the fact that a single inference trajectory has to simultaneously explore the context, store intermediate state, verify evidence, and produce the final answer.
arXiv:2607. 16900v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training API-calling large language model (LLM) agents demands massive amounts of high-quality trajectories.
arXiv:2608. 11715v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) for API calling degrades in multilingual settings.
arXiv:2510. 15416v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate a framework in which LoRA adapters are treated as callable tools that a base language model can dynamically select and invoke.
arXiv:2606. 06574v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) perform inference by following a fixed depth and order, non-recurrent execution of all layers.
UniToolCall introduces a unified framework for tool-use in large language model agents, standardizing toolset construction, dataset generation, and evaluation. The framework aggregates over 22,000 tools and creates a hybrid training corpus of more than 390,000 instances by combining ten public datasets with synthetically generated, structurally controlled trajectories. It models diverse interaction patterns—single‑hop vs. multi‑hop, single‑turn vs. multi‑turn, serial vs. parallel execution—and adds an Anchor Linkage mechanism to enforce cross‑turn dependencies, while converting seven public benchmarks into a common Query–Action–Observation–Answer format for fine‑grained evaluation.
arXiv:2608. 20314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mid-training is increasingly recognized as a critical stage for shaping the capabilities of large language models.
arXiv:2604. 25917v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recursive or looped language models have recently emerged as a new scaling axis by iteratively refining the same model computation over latent states to deepen reasoning.
arXiv:2605. 07339v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in orchestrating tools for reasoning tasks.
arXiv:2604. 07822v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study implicit reasoning, i.
arXiv:2609.23490v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly execute multi-step workflows through tool use and interaction with users and environments. However, curr...