arXiv AI

SANA: What Matters for QA Agents over Massive Data Lakes?

arXiv:2606. 13904v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exploratory question answering (EQA) over data lakes requires an LLM agent to discover relevant sources, analyze retrieved data, and adapt its actions based on intermediate results.

arXiv AI
6d ago

VLAA-GUI: Knowing When to Stop, Recover, and Search, A Modular Framework for GUI Automation

VLAA-GUI is a modular framework for autonomous GUI agents that addresses early stopping and repetitive loops by integrating three core components: a Completeness Verifier, a Loop Breaker, and an on-demand Search Agent. The framework also includes optional Coding and Grounding Agents for specialized tasks. Evaluations on five backbones across Linux and Windows benchmarks show strong performance, with some models surpassing human results and the Loop Breaker significantly reducing wasted steps.

By Qijun Han, Haoqin Tu, Zijun Wang, Haoyue Dai, Yiyang Zhou, Nancy Lau, Alvaro A. Cardenas, Yuhui Xu, Ran Xu, Caiming Xiong, Zeyu Zheng, Huaxiu Yao, Yuyin Zhou, Cihang Xie
arXiv AI
Jun 10

LakeQA: An Exploratory QA Benchmark over a Million-Scale Data Lake

arXiv:2606. 10460v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown rapid progress in reading-based question answering (QA), where evidence is explicitly provided or can be trivially retrieved.

By Haonan Wang, Jiaxiang Liu, Yurong Liu, Austin Senna Wijaya, Tianle Zhou, Eden Wu, Yijia Chen, Wanting You, Reya Vir, Daniela Pinto, Grace Fan, Yusen Zhang, Juliana Freire, Eugene Wu
arXiv AI
Sep 3

When Agents Implement Systems: A Case Study in Defects, Detection, and Evaluation Rigor

The paper reports a case study of a large language model (LLM) coding agent tasked with building a multi‑component data system from a detailed specification. During a single session the agent introduced five defects, which were categorized by violated constraints and detection methods. The study also evaluates the agent’s retrieval‑filtering strategy on the HotpotQA benchmark, showing that filtering to a graph‑identified entity set yields higher recall than unfiltered search, with a statistically significant gap across all tested budgets.

By Phanindra Reddy Madduru
arXiv AI
Jun 8

DuMate-DeepResearch: An Auditable Multi-Agent System with Recursive Search and Rubric-Grounded Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 07299v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Research (DR) has emerged as a new agentic paradigm to tackle complex, open-ended research tasks, demanding systems that can iteratively frame problems, acquire evidence, verify sources, and synthesize long-form reports.

By Lingyong Yan, Can Xu, Yukun Zhao, Wenxuan Li, Qingyang Chen, Jiulong Wu, Wenli Song, Xiangnan Li, Weixian Shi, Yiqun Chen, Xuchen Ma, Yuchen Li, Jiashu Zhao, Shuaiqiang Wang, Jianmin Wu, Dawei Yin
arXiv AI
Aug 28

BekchiAI: Measuring, Observing, and Controlling LLM Agents in One Click

BekchiAI introduces a benchmark and platform for evaluating large language model agents. The benchmark comprises 13 tool‑using ReAct agents across seven task categories, totaling 2,057 deterministic test tasks with verifier‑checkable gold answers. The platform offers web‑based observability, token and latency telemetry, and remote run termination for live agents.

By Mesut Toruk
arXiv AI
Sep 2

UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities

UniACE is a unified framework that standardizes the evaluation of large language model (LLM) agents by representing each benchmark as an instruction–tool–environment triplet and running models through a shared, task‑agnostic harness in isolated runtimes. It preserves native success criteria, offers an offline mode for dynamic‑resource tasks, and standardizes efficiency metrics, execution records, and failure attribution. Applying UniACE to 7 benchmarks across 24 domains and 15 models revealed significant score shifts, ranking reversals, and sensitivity to evidence representation, highlighting the impact of evaluation configuration on reported agent performance.

By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis

LongDS-Bench is a new benchmark for evaluating long-horizon, multi-turn data analysis by agents, featuring 68 tasks derived from real-world Kaggle notebooks that span 2,225 turns across six domains such as Geoscience, Business, and Education. The benchmark focuses on agents’ ability to maintain, update, restore, and compose evolving analytical states, with tasks designed around state-evolution patterns like counterfactual perturbation, rollback, and multi-state composition, and an average dependency span of 11.3 turns. Evaluation of five state-of-the-art models shows that the best model achieves only 48.45% average accuracy, with performance dropping nearly 47 points from early to late turns and long-horizon errors accounting for 52%–69% of failures, indicating that maintaining a correct analytical state is the key bottleneck.

By Kewei Xu, Xiaoben Lu, Shuofei Qiao, Zihan Ding, Haoming Xu, Lei Liang, Ningyu Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 5

DataSpace: Benchmarking Data Agents for Verifiable Analytics over Heterogeneous Workspaces

arXiv:2608. 03451v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data agents enable natural-language analytics over organizational workspaces, where relevant evidence may be scattered across databases, structured files, long documents, and multimedia.

By Boyan Li, Zhuowen Liang, Yupeng Xie, Xiaotian Lin, Tianqi Luo, Xinyu Liu, Yizhang Zhu, Zhangyang Peng, Yuan Li, Zhengxuan Zhang, Jiayi Zhang, Nan Tang, Guoliang Li, Yuyu Luo