arXiv:2606. 10412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid evolution of financial technology demands sophisticated artificial intelligence systems capable of handling diverse challenges across multiple domains simultaneously.
By Fanrong Liu, Zhang Yuwei, Mingni Luo
arXiv:2605. 05580v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantitative trading agents have demonstrated substantial promise in automating factor discovery, signal aggregation, and portfolio execution.
By Yishuo Yuan, Jiayi Sheng, Sirui Zeng, Jiaqi Wang, Jiaheng Liu
arXiv:2508. 00554v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In financial trading, large language model (LLM)-based agents demonstrate significant potential, but their decisions can be sensitive to noisy and non-stationary market information.
By Li Zhao, Rui Sun, Zuoyou Jiang, Bo Yang, Yuxiao Bai, Mengting Chen, Jing Li, Zuo Bai
arXiv:2603. 21563v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Collaborative multi-agent large language models (LLMs) can solve complex reasoning tasks by decomposing roles, but reinforcement learning for such systems is limited by credit assignment: shared terminal rewards obscure individual contributions and can encourage free-riding.
By Zhongyi Li, Wan Tian, Yikun Ban, Jinju Chen, Huiming Zhang, Yang Liu, Fuzhen Zhuang
arXiv:2602. 08335v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools via multi-agent systems offers a promising new paradigm for decomposing and solving complex problems.
By Yanming Li, Xuelin Zhang, WenJie Lu, Ziye Tang, Maodong Wu, Haotian Luo, Tongtong Wu, Zijie Peng, Hongze Mi, Yibo Feng, Naiqiang Tan, Chao Huang, Lian Peng, Li Shen
arXiv:2606. 06823v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While deep learning has excelled in various domains, its application to sequential decision-making in finance remains challenging due to the low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and non-stationarity of financial data.
By Yuqi Li, Siyuan Liu, Bingjun Liu
The paper "Financial Fragility in Societies of LLM Agents: Coordination Failures and Stabilizing Mechanisms" investigates how large language model agents can collectively cause financial failures when making individual protective decisions. Using the FRAIL framework, the authors simulate bank runs, debt rollovers, and reward crowdfunding, finding that 77% of bank-run and 83% of debt-rollover episodes fail even without malicious agents. They test three interaction mechanisms—compensated commitments, centralized agreements, and participant-led coalitions—each improving outcomes but none dominating across all scenarios, noting that early broad commitments are key to successful stabilization.
By Zhenhao Fu, Ruipeng Xu, Qibing Ren
arXiv:2607. 27853v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Powered by advances in LLMs and autonomous agents, deep research has become one of the most widely adopted agentic products.
By Yijia Xiao, Rujun Han, Yanfei Chen, Zifeng Wang, Ke Jiang, Zhongying CuiZhu, Vishy Tirumalashetty, Wei Wang, Burak Gokturk, Tomas Pfister, Chen-Yu Lee
arXiv:2607. 11141v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) based agents are beginning to participate in portfolio construction and market analysis, where decisions must be justified under evolving information and risk constraints.
By Changlun Li, Peixian Ma, Qiqi Duan, Zhenyu Lin, Peineng Wu
arXiv:2606. 26350v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although large language model agents are increasingly applied to quantitative-finance workflows, their evaluation remains fragmented across isolated tasks, while the financial relevance of benchmark tasks is often overlooked.
By Kaicheng Zhang, Wen Ge, Lei Jiang, Weixin Yang, Jordan Langham-Lopez, Jialin Yu, Lukasz Szpruch, Hao Ni
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high‑stakes real‑world systems such as financial markets. This study demonstrates that enhancing individual LLM capability can actually worsen system‑level outcomes by making models behave more similarly, leading to correlated actions that increase risk. Using an agent‑based simulation of LLM traders, the authors show that while higher capability can reduce market risk when reasoning is accurate, it can amplify risk when agents share misinformation, revealing a capability paradox.
By Jillian Ross, Eric So, Zoe De Simone, Charles Pozniak, Andrew W. Lo
arXiv:2608. 16386v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial agents must do more than recall domain knowledge: they must be both reliable, executing precise operations over grounded evidence, and executive, sustaining long-horizon research whose conclusions remain auditable.
By Agent Team, B. Zhang, Yaze Geng, Lei Tang, Yaoyang Yi, Zonghan Wu, Yifan Hu, Kun Wang, Qingsong Wen, Yilei Shao