arXiv Computation and Language

Error-Type-Aware Loss Reweighting for Robust Named Entity Recognition with Noisy LLM Labels

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to annotate datasets for training smaller, task‑specialized models such as named entity recognition (NER). However, current fine‑tuning processes ignore the annotation noise introduced by LLMs, leading to degraded performance, and existing noise‑robust losses fail to handle the heterogeneous nature of NER noise (e.g., missing mentions vs. type errors). The authors propose error‑type‑aware loss reweighting, which applies separate reweighting rules for different erroneous token types, improving F1 scores by 0.8–2.0 percentage points on average and up to 4.6 points on Wikigold at 24.1% noise.

arXiv AI
Jun 3

Fixing FOLIO and MALLS: Verified Annotations and an LLM-assisted Framework to Focus Human Relabeling

arXiv:2606. 02837v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate translation from Natural Language to First-Order Logic (NL-to-FOL) underpins neurosymbolic AI systems and Natural Language Inference (NLI), making the quality of NL-to-FOL benchmarks essential -- yet these datasets have never been rigorously audited.

By Andrea Brunello, Cristian Curaba, Luca Geatti, Michele Mignani, Angelo Montanari, Nicola Saccomanno
arXiv AI
2d ago

Is Human Annotation Necessary? Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection in Machine Translation

The paper introduces Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection (ESD) in machine translation, a self‑evolution framework that replaces human annotations with pseudo‑labels generated by a large language model. By iteratively applying Minimum Bayes Risk decoding, the method produces high‑quality error spans without costly human effort. Experiments on WMT Metrics Shared Task datasets show that models trained solely on these pseudo‑labels outperform both unadapted baselines and supervised models trained on human data at system and span levels, while keeping sentence‑level performance competitive.

By Boxuan Lyu, Haiyue Song, Zhi Qu
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Just Pass Twice: Efficient Token Classification with LLMs for Zero-Shot NER

Just Pass Twice (JPT) is a method that allows causal large language models to perform token classification for zero‑shot named entity recognition by concatenating the input with itself, giving each token full bidirectional context without architectural changes. The approach combines these representations with definition‑guided entity embeddings to enable flexible zero‑shot generalization. JPT achieves state‑of‑the‑art results, outperforming prior methods by an average of +7.9 F1 on CrossNER and MIT benchmarks and running over 20× faster than comparable generative approaches.

By Ahmed Ewais, Ahmed Hashish, Amr Ali
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

PaSta: Noisy Node Classification with Partial Label Learning

PaSta introduces a Partial label-based Self‑training framework for noisy node classification on graphs. The method trains multiple annotators to generate high‑quality partial labels, then uses a partial‑label classification model with two loss functions to learn both labels and representations. A closed‑loop self‑training strategy further refines annotators, yielding an average 1.1% improvement over state‑of‑the‑art methods across five datasets.

By Yujing Liu, Yixin Liu, Yu Zheng, Yue Tan, Alan Wee-Chung Liew, Shirui Pan
arXiv AI
3d ago

Forget or Fine-tune? A Comparative Study of Machine Unlearning Strategies for Noisy Label Correction

The paper compares five machine unlearning (MU) methods—NegGrad, Fine‑Tuning (FT), Random Labeling (RL), SalUn, and MUNBa—on noisy‑label correction across CIFAR‑10, CIFAR‑100, and Food‑101N. Results show that the best MU strategy depends on the noise type: FT works well for most closed‑set noise, RL and SalUn are robust and nearly match retraining accuracy under instance‑dependent noise, while MUNBa excels only under extreme symmetric noise. In open‑set noise, retraining on the cleaned data actually hurts performance, indicating that approximating retraining is not suitable in that regime, yet all MU methods still achieve near‑retraining accuracy on Food‑101N with much lower runtime.

By Jo\~ao L. P. Santana, Filipe R. Cordeiro