The paper investigates whether recent attention‑mechanism improvements—specifically gated attention, Kimi K3, Kimi Delta Attention, and Attention Residuals—effectively eliminate the attention‑sink problem when scaling language models to a one‑million‑token context window. Using a new diagnostic suite called SinkProbe, the authors evaluate sink mass, massive activation, position‑resolved recall, and the recency gap across four small models that vary only in token mixing and depth. Their findings show that the training objective, rather than the architecture, drives the emergence of attention sinks; gating did not replicate its previously reported benefits at the larger scale, and sink mass, activations, and positional bias behaved independently.
By Sara Rizwan, Samaanah Abdus Salam
arXiv:2608.12149v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We present the first systematic study of Massive activations (MAs) in layer-interleaved HLA LLMs and uncover two architecture-aligned morphologies:...
By Zunhai Su, Bohan Sun, Xialie Zhuang, Shuibai Zhang, He Xiao, Jing Xiong, Hengyuan Zhang, Zhongzhu Zhou, Tiantian Zhang, Ngai Wong, Chuan-Wei Kuo
arXiv:2605.12922v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models can follow complex instructions in a single turn, yet over long multi-turn interactions they often lose the thread of instruc...
By Vardhan Dongre, Joseph Hsieh, Viet Dac Lai, Seunghyun Yoon, Trung Bui, Dilek Hakkani-T\"ur
arXiv:2606. 08105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When attention concentrates on a single token, a sink, what is the model actually computing?
By Lukas Fesser, Mozes Jacobs, Thomas Fel, Andy Keller, Sham Kakade
The paper investigates when a language model actually learns task information versus when its readout (unembedding matrix) learns to express that information. Using a new parameter‑trajectory cross‑coding method, the authors find that hidden states can encode task data early in training, but the readout reorganizes only in a narrow window (0.4–1.1% of Pythia’s pretraining). By varying the readout learning rate, they show that faster readout learning reduces the gap between hidden‑state encoding and output expression without affecting final performance.
By Matteo He, William F. Shen, Alex Iacob, Andrej Jovanovic, Xinchi Qiu, Nicholas D. Lane
arXiv:2608. 01676v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse attention is widely deployed in long-context serving stacks, yet no framework audits how discarding blocks changes the influence of specific content on model output.
By Xingyu Ren, Youran Sun, Chugang Yi, Haizhao Yang
The projection of queries and keys are central to the attention mechanism in Transformer architectures. While they are mathematically symmetric, they play different roles in attention mechanisms.
arXiv:2607. 06621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The pre-softmax score of an attention head is a bilinear form $score(i,j) = x_i^T M x_j$ in a learned operator $M = W_q^T W_k$.
By Li Hengyu (Institute for Solid State Physics, The University of Tokyo)
The study investigates whether open‑weight language models can introspect on their own internal computations. Using the Open‑Weight Masked Introspection (OWMI) framework, researchers intervened on various internal components of eight models and asked them to report whether changes had occurred. Across 78,000 measurements, none of the models reliably distinguished real interventions from sham ones, with AUROC values essentially at chance.
Why It Matters: The findings suggest that current open‑weight models lack the ability to audit their own internal states, highlighting a limitation for oversight that relies on a model’s self‑reporting.
By Emilio Ferrara
We present the first systematic study of Massive activations (MAs) in layer-interleaved HLA LLMs and uncover two architecture-aligned morphologies: MAs consistently spike immediately before full attention layers, forming pre-attention spikes (PAS), and can persist through intervening linear attention layers, giving rise to inter-spike plateaus (ISP). As full attention becomes denser, successive PAS become increasingly connected through ISP, ultimately recovering the stable MA morphology of full attention LLMs.
The study investigates how post‑training of large autoregressive language models (ARMs) into masked diffusion models (MDMs) affects their internal computation. Across two 7B ARM‑MDM families and four diagnostic tasks, the authors find that MDMs retain much of the ARM’s high‑attribution pathways on prefix‑dominant tasks, but reorganize computation toward earlier layers on globally constrained tasks. Component‑level probes reveal that ARMs depend on sharply specialized components, whereas MDMs show weaker specialization and more diffuse output‑space alignment.
By Injin Kong, Hyoungjoon Lee, Yohan Jo
arXiv:2602.02133v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Autoregressive language models (ARMs) suffer from the reversal curse: after learning ''$A$ is $B$,'' they often fail on the reverse query ''$...
By Moongyu Jeon, Sangwoo Shin, BumJun Kim, Kyelim Lee, Albert No