arXiv:2607. 09493v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic LLM systems that generate code through multi-turn tool use face a fundamental context problem: each session starts from zero, discarding the configuration choices, domain constraints, data schemas, and tool-use patterns that made previous sessions productive.
By Sanjana Pedada, Aditya Dhavala, Neelraj Patil
arXiv:2609. 04875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-running LLM agents are stateful: beyond the transcript they accrete compressed summaries, plaintext memory, pending tool plans, and, under every serving API, a KV cache.
By Chao Yao, Yangbo Wei, Zhen Huang, Junhong Qian, Chenle Chen, Shaoqiang Lu, Chen Wu, Lei He
arXiv:2609.37743v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM agents performing long-horizon tasks accumulate tool results that later steps may need. Passing the full history to every invocation is costly even...
By Savini Kashmira, Jayanaka L. Dantanarayana, Lingjia Tang, Jason Mars
arXiv:2607. 01916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model agents can repair real repository issues, but they often spend large context budgets on whole-file reads, broad searches, and long terminal outputs where useful evidence is mixed with irrelevant code and logs.
By Chiwang Luk, Matin Mohammad Najafi, Zhifeng Jia, Wei Yang, Xiuchang Li, Jinwei Zhu, Yang Ren, Lei Chen, Gao Cong
arXiv:2610.05281v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Modern agents increasingly ground their reasoning in observations returned by tools, such as file contents read from a workspace. However, the data...
By Yingying Liu, Junzhou Fang, Chenxiong Qian
Tool-using language-model agents are governed not only by task prompts but also by persistent system-side instructions that specify tools, arguments, policies, execution protocols, and recovery. Compressing these agent control contexts (ACCs) can reduce input cost and context use, yet existing prompt-compression evaluations do not reveal whether the resulting control remains operationally reliable.
arXiv:2607. 25066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon LLM agents accumulate reasoning traces, actions, and tool observations that can eventually exceed a model's fixed context window.
By Thang Dang, Yuma Ichikawa, Sakina Fatima, Koichi Shirahata
LLM agent benchmarks measure task completion, reliability, and inference cost, but not the persistent data an agent run leaves on disk, including logs, context snapshots, checkpoints, and debug traces. We introduce AgentFootprint, a cross-framework benchmark of post-run agent storage footprint.
Long-horizon tool agents are bottlenecked by how their context grows toward the limits of the context window. Recent systems make context management agent- or system-controlled, but they either learn a compression policy that discards evidence or manage context in a layer the agent never sees.
arXiv:2606. 02461v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language agents spend substantial inference time solving individual tasks, yet the experience acquired in one episode is often underutilized in future episodes.
By Yiheng Shu, Bernal Jim\'enez Guti\'errez, Saisri Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Yuguang Yao, Huan Sun, Yu Su
arXiv:2606. 02461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents spend substantial inference time solving individual tasks, yet the experience acquired in one episode is often underutilized in future episodes.
By Yiheng Shu, Bernal Jim\'enez Guti\'errez, Saisri Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Yuguang Yao, Huan Sun, Yu Su
arXiv:2607. 14159v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An agent harness is the external control layer that turns a base LLM into an executable agent by managing context, tools, orchestration, memory, decoding, and output handling.
By Yue Huang, Wenjie Wang, Han Bao, Yuchen Ma, Xiaonan Luo, Yi Nian, Haomin Zhuang, Zheyuan Liu, Yue Zhao, Xiangliang Zhang