H2Table introduces a hierarchical hypergraph representation for complex tables, enabling a hypergraph encoder to capture semantic relationships between headers and cells. The framework uses learnable query vectors to extract structural embeddings for large language models. Experiments on the HiTab dataset show a 22.88% improvement over state‑of‑the‑art baselines on tables with four levels of nesting.
By Jia Ling, Yangfan Wang, Chen Tang, Haoming Tan, Yang Yang, Yi Guan, Jingchi Jiang
arXiv:2606. 28916v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce GRAB, a constructor-encoder-bridge pipeline for table question answering.
By Simone Varriale, Tamara Cucumides, Floris Geerts, Paolo Papotti
PARTAB is a framework that improves large language model reasoning on tables by constructing a structured evidence interface. It represents query‑relevant evidence as semantically coherent, row‑linked table regions and performs hierarchical selection over column groups and row‑level partitions before composing the evidence for answer generation. Evaluations on multiple table reasoning benchmarks show that PARTAB consistently outperforms full‑table prompting and recent methods, achieving strong performance on WikiTableQuestions and TabFact while remaining competitive on numerical reasoning tasks.
By Md Mahadi Hasan Nahid, Davood Rafiei
The paper introduces Table Graph Reasoner (TabGR), a model that represents tables as an Attributed Table Graph (ATG) to preserve row-column-cell structure and enable graph-based reasoning without task-specific training. It also proposes a Question-Guided Personalized PageRank (QG-PPR) mechanism to rerank tabular data and address the lost-in-the-middle issue. Experiments on multiple table reasoning benchmarks show that TabGR outperforms state-of-the-art models by up to 9.7% in accuracy.
By Yuxiang Wang, Junhao Gan, Shengxiang Gao, Shenghao Ye, Zhengyi Yang, Jianzhong Qi
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in table reasoning, but their effectiveness degrades as tables grow in size and complexity due to irrelevant context and difficulty localizi...
arXiv:2506. 18421v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The majority of data in businesses and industries is stored in tables, databases, and data warehouses.
By Ce Li, Xiaofan Liu, Zhiyan Song, Ce Chi, Boshen Shi, Chen Zhao, Guanguang Chang, Zhendong Wang, Kexin Yang, Xing Wang, Chao Deng, Junlan Feng
arXiv:2605. 20254v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results on NLP tasks, however, their performance on tabular data still needs research attention, because Table Question-Answering (TQA) requires precise cell retrieval and multi-step structured reasoning.
By Amritansh Maurya, Navjot Singh, Mohammed Javed, Omar Moured
arXiv:2604. 12503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various tasks but remain prone to hallucinations in knowledge-intensive scenarios.
By Shuai Wang, Xixi Wang, Yinan Yu
arXiv:2604. 28076v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced Table Question Answering, where most queries can be answered by extracting information or simple aggregation.
By An-Yang Ji, Jun-Peng Jiang, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv:2607. 22633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Table Question Answering (TableQA) aims to reason over tables to answer user queries.
By Guixin Su, Qiankun Pi, Mayi Xu, Wenli Li, Ming Zhong, Yuanyuan Zhu, Jiawei Jiang, Tieyun Qian
arXiv:2607. 19398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-entity compositional questions pose significant challenges to existing retrieval-augmented language models.
By Junyi Wang
arXiv:2608. 03565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While modern tabular learners excel at capturing statistical patterns, they frequently operate in a semantic vacuum, treating textual features as discrete symbols, ignoring the rich semantics inherent in feature names or cell entries.
By G\"unther Schindler, Maximilian Schambach, Johannes H\"ohne