arXiv:2608.16925v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks and hybrid models infer PDE coefficients from noisy data. When a trained network returns one, no standard check sa...
By Eric Fock
arXiv:2609.26272v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Neural samplers are trained against an unnormalised target $\tilde\pi=e^{-E}$ with no samples from $\pi$, which leaves the practitioner with no way to...
By Jian Xu
arXiv:2607. 05806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training data for machine learning is routinely collected by a selection process the model never sees: loans are observed only when granted, outcomes only when a test was ordered.
By Gunner Levi Howe
The study investigates how the composition of data during the mid‑training phase of language models affects performance across multiple domains. Experiments with Qwen3‑8B‑Base on five distinct KOR‑Bench domains show that moderate coverage (10%‑40%) yields the best per‑domain results, and that alignment passes cannot fully close the performance gaps created by mid‑training data choices. Additionally, zero coverage in mid‑training severely degrades accuracy, while a carefully tuned allocation can provide the largest overall pipeline improvement.
By Yunpeng Xu, Kun Zheng
The paper argues that reporting scale‑invariant statistics such as cosine similarity without their noise floor is misleading when evaluating interpretability transfer from full‑precision to quantized neural networks. It derives a closed‑form expression for the expected cosine similarity based on a dimensionless parameter κ = n
ho^2/d, measures the class separation ρ on real activations, and shows that a reported cosine of 0.996 between full‑precision and INT4 models cannot be interpreted as preservation without knowing the sample size n. The authors demonstrate that at INT4 the direction of the interpretability artifact rotates beyond the estimator’s own noise, while at INT8 no significant movement is detected, and they highlight that scale‑invariant metrics cannot distinguish between translation and attenuation of a transferred decision variable.
By Pranav Varshney
arXiv:2608. 12652v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmark contamination is diagnosed today with n-gram overlap, with likelihood-based membership inference, or with canary strings, and each needs something usually unavailable: the training corpus, a well-chosen test statistic, or foresight at dataset release.
By Florian Braun
arXiv:2608. 13087v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) solvers report the best of many sampled solutions per instance, and the sample count is, by convention, identical for every instance.
By Jinhyung Bae
arXiv:2607. 10203v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adaptive-compute world models -- early-exit or mixture-of-depths predictors that spend variable depth per step -- assume depth buys better predictions and can be routed adaptively.
By Achyuthan Sivasankar
arXiv:2606. 31630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models increasingly write probabilistic programs (in NumPyro, Stan, or Pyro), but a program that compiles, runs, and passes every unit test can still be \emph{statistically} wrong -- a Gaussian likelihood for heavy-tailed data, a Poisson for over-dispersed counts, an invalid prior support, or a pathological parameterization.
By Jian Xu, Delu Zeng, John Paisley, Qibin Zhao
arXiv:2609.07162v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Several properties safety monitors are asked to certify, among them cross-tenant noninterference, sandbagging and evaluation awareness, are 2-safety hy...
By Xin Xu
arXiv:2608. 00675v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autoregressive models accumulate error over long rollouts, yet at deployment there is no ground truth to measure it against.
By Alexander Scheinker
arXiv:2607. 10203v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adaptive-compute world models -- early-exit or mixture-of-depths predictors that spend variable depth per step -- assume depth buys better predictions and can be routed adaptively.
By Achyuthan Sivasankar