arXiv AI

TESTNAV: Pareto-Guided Search for Compositional Robustness Testing

arXiv:2608. 19882v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep learning models remain vulnerable to real-world input perturbations, especially when multiple corruptions co-occur in the same input (e.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

\textsc{TestifAI}: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

TestifAI is a deep learning testing framework that estimates model robustness against combinations of input perturbations efficiently. It allows users to define structured spaces of semantic perturbations and severity levels, then query robustness for any combination. By employing partial model tomography, TestifAI reconstructs higher‑order perturbation effects from low‑order tests, achieving less than 7% error while cutting inference counts by 60‑80% on image and language classification tasks.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

TestifAI: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

TestifAI is a deep learning testing framework that estimates model robustness against combinations of input perturbations efficiently. It allows users to define structured spaces of semantic perturbations and severity levels, then query robustness for any combination. By using partial model tomography, TestifAI reconstructs higher-order perturbation effects from low-order tests, achieving less than 7% error while reducing inferences by 60–80%.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

\textsc{TestifAI}: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

TestifAI is a deep learning testing framework that estimates model robustness against combinations of semantic input perturbations such as blur, brightness, and zoom. It allows users to define operational conditions as structured spaces with discrete severity levels and query robustness for any combination. By employing partial model tomography, TestifAI reconstructs higher‑order perturbation effects from low‑order tests, achieving less than 7% estimation error while reducing inference counts by 60‑80% across five image and language classification tasks.

By Arooj Arif, Tobias Hartung, Elena Botoeva, Alexandros Koliousis
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

DeepBias: Adaptive In-depth Probing of Social Biases in LVLMs

While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities, they remain highly susceptible to embedded social biases. Existing bias evaluation protocols predominantly rely on static datasets, which provide only a superficial assessment, as their fixed test cases cannot adaptively evolve to measure the true depth and limits of model vulnerabilities.

arXiv AI
Jul 28

DecoupleMix: Decoupled Ratio Search and Convex Allocation for Scalable VLM Data Recipes

arXiv:2607. 24516v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While data curation for Vision Language Models (VLMs) is increasingly active, public practice for constructing pretraining mixtures remains largely heuristic: practitioners stack datasets that pass quality filters, set cross-domain ratios by intuition, and lack a principled, attributable criterion for admitting new data, while frontier recipes remain undisclosed.

By Jiahao Xie, Zhongbin Guo, Qianle Wang, Ruiqi Lu, Dongling Xiao, Wanxuan Sun, Cheng Yang