arXiv:2208. 11582v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The wide spread of false information online, including misinformation and disinformation, has become a major problem for our highly digitised and globalised society.
By Haiyue Yuan, Enes Altuncu, Shujun Li, Can Baskent, Jason R. C. Nurse
arXiv:2607. 28282v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluating the quality and relevance of textual outputs from Large Language Models (LLMs) remains challenging and resource-intensive.
By Bertil Braun, Martin Forell
arXiv:2608. 11390v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative engines are reshaping the web ecosystem by making citations a key mechanism for allocating attention, attribution, and downstream value.
By Chen Xu, Zitian Guo, Chenyan Xiong
arXiv:2608. 02399v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Content-based detection of unreliable news is increasingly difficult, as low-reliability sources mimic credible journalism and generative AI makes fabricated content harder to flag.
By Raphaela Ke{\ss}ler, Roman David Ventzke, Viola Priesemann, Giordano De Marzo
arXiv:2607. 20463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents an AI-driven browser extension that identifies clickbait to help users avoid misleading Internet articles.
By Wojciech Michaluk, Tymoteusz Urban, Mateusz Kubita, Soveatin Kuntur, Anna Wr\'oblewska
arXiv:2607. 15267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Poisoning pretraining data can introduce harmful behaviors to LMs that are difficult to detect and mitigate.
By Victoria Graf, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Noah A. Smith, David Kohlbrenner, Kyle Lo
Large Language Models (LLMs) generate fluent long-form text, however, often add unsupported factual claims. Existing verification techniques improve factuality by grounding generation in external evidence.
Today we’re introducing new technology to help researchers identify content created by our tools and joining the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity Steering Committee to promote industry standards.
arXiv:2604. 06820v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLMs make it increasingly easy to generate deceptive content at scale, creating a need for scalable misinformation risk evaluation based on whether readers find such content credible and are willing to share it.
By Zonghuan Xu, Xiang Zheng, Yutao Wu, Xingjun Ma
Cancer-related discussions on social media provide an important space for information exchange and peer support, but also facilitate the spread of misinformation that may influence prevention, screening, and treatment decisions. Existing research on cancer misinformation often relies on narrow definitions, small-scale datasets, or binary labeling frameworks.
arXiv:2606. 26437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing metrics for factuality and faithfulness evaluate whether an answer is supported or contradicted by its grounding documents, but they fail to capture when both supporting and contradicting evidence coexist.
By Siyi Liu, Aaron Halfaker, Dan Roth, Patrick Xia
Large language models are increasingly deployed in citation-augmented settings, yet the effect of citation presence on model behavior independent of factual content remains poorly understood. We introduce AuthorityBench, a 220,564-prompt multi-domain benchmark that isolates how citation-based authority signals influence epistemic behavior in LLMs.