arXiv:2601. 00791v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Verifying whether a language model is genuinely reasoning or pattern-matching remains an open problem: learned verifiers are expensive, and output-based heuristics are brittle.
By Valentin No\"el
arXiv:2605. 04893v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When a language model processes a hallucinated response, its attention routing tends to fail in one of two shapes: over-concentrating on a narrow set of positions, or spreading so diffusely that relevance is diluted, and the shape of the failure carries diagnostic signal.
By Dominik Dahlem, Diego Maniloff, Mac Misiura
The paper proposes using the temporal volatility of internal attention mechanisms—measured by an unsupervised attention dispersion metric—as a diagnostic signal for hallucinations in large language models. It demonstrates that spikes in attention entropy within intermediate layers correlate with reasoning breakdowns, and shows statistically significant AUC improvements of up to +0.076 over output-based baselines on GSM8K and MATH-500 benchmarks using the Qwen2.5 model family.
By Shardul P. More, Tanuja S. Pawar
arXiv:2606. 02628v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate whether open-source LLMs encode a linearly separable truthfulness signal in their hidden states, and at which network depth this signal is strongest.
By Aizierjiang Aiersilan
arXiv:2607. 24586v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models can produce fluent text that is false, unsupported by the available evidence, or inconsistent with information that appears to be internally represented by the model.
By Bianca Raimondi, Davide Evangelista, Maurizio Gabbrielli, Elena Loli Piccolomini
arXiv:2609.00231v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Existing research on object hallucination in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) predominantly attributes the problem to language priors such as o...
By Peiyang Xu, Xiaopei Zhu, Jun Zhu, Xiaolin Hu
arXiv:2608. 06849v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context LLM inference is bottlenecked by quadratic attention computation and growing KV-cache costs.
By Yehan Yang, Junyuan Shang, Yang Li, Guanqun Zhao, Shuohuan Wang, Dianhai Yu
The paper introduces HeadEntropy, a training‑free method that predicts the correctness of large language model (LLM) answers by measuring how stable each attention head’s pattern is to further gradient updates. By linking the trace of the softmax Jacobian to 2‑Renyi entropy, the authors show that attention spread correlates with gradient stability, enabling accurate hallucination detection without reference annotations. Across five instruction‑tuned LLMs and five diverse datasets—including medicine, multi‑hop reasoning, and mathematics—HeadEntropy achieves a 0.736 AUROC, outperforming other training‑free baselines and matching hidden‑state probes while incurring less than 1% of inference cost.
By Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Maya Varma, Asad Aali, Yabin Zhang, Magdalini Paschali, Sanmi Koyejo, Curtis Langlotz, Akshay Chaudhari
arXiv:2607. 01571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enables large language models (LLMs) to solve complex problems by generating intermediate reasoning steps.
By Aria Masoomi, Mahsa Bazzaz, Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni
arXiv:2606. 10198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination detection in large language and vision-language models is increasingly framed as selective prediction, where a detector assigns a confidence score and abstains when confidence is low.
By Nina I. Shamsi
arXiv:2606. 03022v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs), characterized by the generation of content inconsistent with contextual facts or logical constraints -- remains a persistent challenge for reliable deployment.
By Mingkuan Zhao, Wentao Hu, Tianchen Huang, Yuheng Min, Suquan Chen, Yide Gao, Yanbo Zhai, Shuangyong Song, Xuelong Li
arXiv:2606. 24543v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are traditionally viewed as autoregressive generators.
By Kanishk Awadhiya