arXiv:2606. 30441v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A rigorous formalization of system requirements is a fundamental prerequisite for the verification of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS).
By Marco Aruta, Francesco Improta, Vadim Malvone, Aniello Murano, Vladana Perlic
arXiv:2602. 13937v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has improved access to machine learning, yet existing techniques often remain limited in flexibility, transparency, and execution reliability.
By Dat Le, Duc-Cuong Le, Anh-Son Nguyen, Tuan-Dung Bui, Thu-Trang Nguyen, Son Nguyen, Hieu Dinh Vo
arXiv:2607. 18357v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models now write a growing share of the world's code, increasingly inside agents and serving systems that compile, execute, or dispatch generated code without line-by-line review.
By Shuoming Zhang, Ruiyuan Xu, Haofeng Li, Qiuchu Yu, Yangyu Zhang, Chunwei Xia, Xiaobing Feng, Chenxi Wang, Huimin Cui, Jiacheng Zhao
arXiv:2602.00612v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have demonstrated promising generative capabilities and are increasingly used to produce formal languages d...
By Yitong Zhang, Yongmin Li, Yuetong Liu, Jia Li, Xiaoran Jia, Zherui Li, Ge Li
arXiv:2603. 14501v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models excel in high-resource programming languages but struggle with low-resource ones.
By Junhang Cheng, Fang Liu, Jia Li, Chengru Wu, Nanxiang Jiang, Li Zhang
ContrAgent is a contract‑based framework that provides symbolic temporal supervision for large language model agents. It records an agent’s tool‑call sequence as a trace of checkable predicates and formalizes desired behaviors with assume‑guarantee contracts expressed in linear temporal logic over finite traces (LTLf). Each contract is compiled into a deterministic finite automaton that both gates actions online and evaluates recorded traces offline, enabling deterministic, reproducible verdicts and significantly lower per‑call latency compared to existing LLM‑judge and rule‑based guardrail baselines.
By Yifeng Xiao, Pierluigi Nuzzo
arXiv:2606. 25987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) attain remarkable surface fluency on code, yet they neither formally guarantee the syntactic validity of their output nor leverage the hierarchical structure defining the target language.
By Alexandre Bouayad
arXiv:2608. 02641v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can translate natural-language optimization problems into solver-ready formulations, but direct code generation is brittle: schema, indexing, and semantic errors can cause compilation failures, infeasible models, or incorrect objectives, while iterative repair, search, and multi-agent workflows increase inference cost.
By Penglin Zhu, Linhai Zhang, Jungang Xu, Xinchi Wei, Xiuqi Wu
Large language model (LLM) agents augmented by tools can automate complex, multi-step tasks, such as web navigation, code generation, and workflow orchestration, by acting on external systems through...
arXiv:2606. 24245v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate complex tasks by integrating language models with external tools and environments.
By Pingchuan Ma, Zhaoyu Wang, Zimo Ji, Yuguang Zhou, Zhantong Xue, Zongjie Li, Shuai Wang, Xiaoqin Zhang
arXiv:2609.37233v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Datalog underpins reasoning tasks such as program analysis, but its programs are hard to write. Existing synthesizers automate this task but require...
By Yuan Li, Hanyun Jiang, Guowei Tian, Chengpeng Wang, Peisen Yao
arXiv:2608. 20314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mid-training is increasingly recognized as a critical stage for shaping the capabilities of large language models.
By Fengqing Jiang, Yite Wang, Boyi Liu, Zhaoyang Wang, Canwen Xu, Zhewei Yao, Radha Poovendran, Yuxiong He