arXiv Machine Learning

Long-Horizon Language Model Reinforcement Learning via Progressive Point Matching

arXiv AI
Oct 16

Progress Reward Model for Reinforcement Learning via Large Language Models

The paper introduces PRM4RL, a framework that combines task planning and dense reward generation using large language models for reinforcement learning. It decomposes complex tasks into manageable subtasks and employs a fine‑grained progress function to monitor execution, which is then used to construct a Progress Reward Model for potential‑based reward shaping. Experiments on robotics control tasks show that PRM4RL outperforms existing LLM‑based planning and reward methods, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance.

By Xiuhui Zhang, Ning Gao, Xingyu Jiang, Yihui Chen, Yuheng Pan, Mohan Zhang, Yue Deng
arXiv AI
Oct 21

TrajEvolve: Trajectory Evolution for Reinforcement Learning with Hindsight Credit Assignment

TrajEvolve introduces a trajectory evolution paradigm with hindsight credit assignment to improve reinforcement learning for large language models on long-horizon tasks. It refines low-quality steps in historical trajectories to expose the policy to high-quality compositions that are rarely sampled, and reformulates step-level continuous credit assignment as a binary classification problem to identify redundant steps. Experiments on two datasets show that this approach outperforms existing methods.

By Yi Wen, Hao Chen, Wanyu Wang, Maolin Wang, Pengyue Jia, Derong Xu, Huize Tan, Yingyi Zhang, Wenlin Zhang, Weihong Luo, Xiku Du, Xiangyu Zhao
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

Act More, Decide Less: Skill-Guided Adaptive Action Chunking for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

The paper introduces SPACE, a method for enabling large language model agents to emit variable-length action chunks in long-horizon tasks. By distilling chunk-boundary supervision from programmatic skills derived from successful trajectories, SPACE overcomes the tendency of agents to either act one step at a time or commit to overly long sequences. Experiments on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld demonstrate that SPACE raises success rates by 7.0%–31.3% and cuts LLM decision rounds by up to 78.9%.

By Yanting Yang, Can Jin, Jinman Zhao, Jiahao Wu, Yang Zhou, Zhepeng Wang, Zhendong Wang, Mu Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24

Reinforcing Multi-Turn Reasoning in LLM Agents via Fine-Grained Reward Structure and Credit Assignment

The paper explores how dense, turn-level reward structures can improve reinforcement learning for large language model agents in multi-turn tasks. It introduces three reward granularity types—terminal, delayed, and per-turn—and adapts Group Relative Policy Optimization and Proximal Policy Optimization to each. Experiments on search and game agents show that per-turn rewards consistently yield better training dynamics, faster convergence, and higher answer correctness compared to sparse terminal or delayed rewards.

By Quan Wei, Siliang Zeng, Chenliang Li, Zhongruo Wang, William Brown, Oana Frunza, Wei Deng, Anderson Schneider, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Yang Katie Zhao, Alfredo Garcia, Mingyi Hong
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 24

MiniOpt: Reasoning to Model and Solve General Optimization Problems with Limited Resources

Achieving strong optimization generalization across diverse optimization problems while requiring limited training resources remains a challenging problem for optimization-oriented large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches typically rely on large-scale supervised datasets, costly reasoning annotations, and expensive intermediate step verification, resulting in substantial training overhead.

arXiv AI
Sep 28

Stepwise Intrinsic Rewards for Reasoning in Large Language Models

The paper introduces Stepwise Marginal Information Gain (MIG), an intrinsic process reward that evaluates how each reasoning step of a large language model (LLM) or vision-language model (VLM) improves the likelihood of the reference answer. MIG rewards only new likelihood maxima, preventing duplicate credit, and is combined with outcome, format, and self‑distillation objectives to guide training. Experiments on eight benchmarks show that this method outperforms outcome‑only reinforcement learning and improves accuracy by up to 4.8 points over binary‑reward training, including a 12.6‑point gain on MathVerse and a 12.9‑point advantage on vision‑language transfer at 7B parameters.

By Xiangwei Wang, Wei Wang, Ken Chen, Nanduni Nimalsiri, Sachith Seneviratne, Saman Halgamuge