The paper introduces LRE (Learned Relevance Eviction), a lightweight, CPU‑only, language‑model‑free scorer that learns which parts of an agent’s interaction history are task‑critical and preserves them verbatim. In experiments, LRE matches or surpasses baseline eviction policies on accuracy‑cost trade‑offs, recovers 93% of full‑history accuracy, reduces worst‑case prompt size by 52%, and outperforms dense and token‑pruning encoders in conversational memory while being 295–1569× smaller. The method also achieves superior budgeted answer quality on LoCoMo reading and can be trained annotation‑free, recovering 95% of supervised scorer performance.
By Nusrat Jahan Lia, Aritra Mazumder
The paper introduces the SAST-IR framework to evaluate large language models’ robustness against persuasion attacks in a memory‑less setting, revealing a flaw called "Refusal Inertia" that masks true vulnerability. Using the CP‑Agent and a custom CounterFact‑Strict dataset, the authors demonstrate that simple, diverse attack strategies achieve a 96% success rate, while complex attacks often trigger defensive compliance. The study highlights severe brittleness in current state‑of‑the‑art models when deprived of conversation history.
By Zhuoang Cai
arXiv:2606. 23195v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on memory systems to maintain long-term coherence.
By Zewen Liu
arXiv:2605. 05686v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language models draw on two knowledge sources: facts baked into weights (parametric memory, PM) and information in context (working memory, WM).
By Qiyao Liang, Risto Miikkulainen, Ila Fiete
arXiv:2607. 15587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual learning studies how deployed language models can continually acquire new tasks without expensive retraining from scratch.
By Yang Meng, Zhenya Liu, Zhuokai Zhao, Yuxin Chen
arXiv:2608.21727v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is deployed to make models better at reasoning tasks, but its side effect on what models will d...
By Renfei Zhang, Niloofar Mireshghallah
arXiv:2606. 02461v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language agents spend substantial inference time solving individual tasks, yet the experience acquired in one episode is often underutilized in future episodes.
By Yiheng Shu, Bernal Jim\'enez Guti\'errez, Saisri Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Yuguang Yao, Huan Sun, Yu Su
arXiv:2607. 09306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models are optimised for scale, yet remain functional rather than companionable, and as an assistant personalises into a companion, accumulating memory of one user, it quietly becomes someone, and can silently acquire traits that harm that user.
By Kwan Soo Shin, In Seok Kang, Yunkyung Min
arXiv:2606. 02461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents spend substantial inference time solving individual tasks, yet the experience acquired in one episode is often underutilized in future episodes.
By Yiheng Shu, Bernal Jim\'enez Guti\'errez, Saisri Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Yuguang Yao, Huan Sun, Yu Su
Large language model (LLM) agents solving multi-step tasks frequently commit to trajectories that are doomed to fail, yet continue to consume substantial inference compute before the failure becomes observable. We show that failure is predictable early from the agent's internal representations: lightweight per-round probes on hidden activations anticipate eventual episode failure as early as the first interaction round, where scorers reading only the agent's observable behavior are barely better than chance.
arXiv:2606. 22030v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate when belief-based memory actually improves large language model (LLM) agents.
By Pranav Singh
arXiv:2607. 17545v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents depend on memory across interactions.
By Qingcan Kang, Mingyang Liu, Shixiong Kai, Kaichao Liang, Zhentao Tang, Yuqi Cui, Tao Zhong, Mingxuan Yuan