The advancement of AI capabilities compels researchers and the public to be more aware of its potential worldwide impact. A pressing near-term concern is the regulation of military AI applications.
arXiv:2607. 26069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI systems are rapidly integrated into critical economic, governmental, and national security functions, the gap between AI adoption and AI security readiness continues to widen.
By Gil Gekker, Rachel Steratore, Everett Smith, Asher Brass-Gershovich, Varun Gandhi, Nicole Nichols, Vijay Bolina, Buck Shlegeris, Lisa Einstein, Dan Lahav, Omer Nevo, Sella Nevo
arXiv:2608. 05173v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI capabilities advance, AI systems will pose greater risks to national security and potentially humanity as a whole.
By Peter Barnett
The article discusses a notable imbalance in AI security research, where studies on attacking AI systems outnumber those on defending them. It highlights that this skew is evident across various subfields such as federated learning, speech recognition, membership inference, and large language models. The authors argue that attack papers often benefit from favorable evaluation conditions, whereas defense papers face stricter standards, resulting in a literature rich in vulnerabilities but lacking robust, deployable protections.
By Youqian Zhang
arXiv:2606. 07245v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI sovereignty is the extent to which a nation independently controls its artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.
By Timothy Clancy, Asmeret Naugle
arXiv:2608. 14565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI safety research has mainly focused on two areas: technical alignment (ensuring AI systems produce human-aligned outputs) and the regulation of generative AI's societal impacts (including unemployment risk and labor market disruption).
By Jaeho Kim, Seokhyun Lee, Jieun Lee, Changhee Lee
arXiv:2607. 02955v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We argue that AI systems used in conducting foreign policy tasks - broadly enacting 'statecraft' - should be a priority test case for technical AI governance research.
By Charles Pozniak, Jeba Sania
arXiv:2609.14796v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The threat that AI persuasion poses to human control has been acknowledged in the literature, but not yet systematically studied. Now that persuasion a...
By Joshua Levy, Mick Yang, Kellin Pelrine
arXiv:2606. 09414v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This report examines practical challenges in operationalising JSP 936 Part 1 for AI assurance in UK Defence.
By Callum Cockburn, Sam Farrow
arXiv:2608.21444v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multi-drone systems are increasingly positioned for safety-critical missions such as search and rescue (SAR) and critical infrastructure monitoring. Ye...
By Timothy Merritt, Alejandro Jarabo-Pe\~nas, Juan Bravo-Arrabal, Maria-Theresa Bahodi, Anders Lyhne Christensen
arXiv:2608. 13272v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A small number of firms based in two states produce the most capable frontier AI models.
By Alan Woodward, Andrew Rogoyski
arXiv:2607. 16224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: An international agreement to limit AI development could be crucial to mitigate risks from AI.
By Lennart Finke