arXiv Machine Learning

A curated multi-endpoint drug-protein bioactivity dataset with construct-aware protein targets

arXiv AI
Sep 3

ProbeMatchDTI: Probe-Driven Multi-Scale Biochemical Pattern Matching for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction

ProbeMatchDTI is a new framework for drug‑target interaction prediction that uses probe‑driven pattern matching to preserve weak biochemical signals. It introduces IterProbe, which retains contextual states across refinement depths and selects them with learnable probes, and BindingProbe, which models drug‑protein complementarity at both local and whole‑pair levels. Experiments show that ProbeMatchDTI outperforms existing methods, improving AUC‑ROC by 2.0% on BindingDB and 0.5% on DrugBank, and its predictions can be integrated into downstream drug‑discovery workflows.

By Quan Hao, Mengyue Fan, Zifan Dong, Youru Li, Jianduo Zhao, Lechuan Xu, Hao Zhang, Fei Xia, Jigang Wang, Chong Qiu, Liguo Zhang
arXiv AI
Oct 21

HierDTA: Hierarchical Structure-Aware Representation Learning for Drug--Target Affinity Prediction

HierDTA is a hierarchical structure‑aware framework for drug–target affinity prediction that represents drugs as atom–motif heterogeneous graphs and proteins as residue interaction graphs. It integrates atom and residue representations via cross‑attention, supplemented by molecule fingerprints and pretrained ESM‑2 embeddings, achieving superior performance on the Davis and KIBA datasets and strong generalization in cold‑start scenarios. Ablation studies and interpretability analyses confirm the contributions of its hierarchical augmentation and interaction components, and case studies demonstrate early enrichment of candidate bioactive compounds.

By Huangchao Xu, Baohua Zhang, Qian Liu, Zhong Jin, Yi Du
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

ProbeMatchDTI: Probe-Driven Multi-Scale Biochemical Pattern Matching for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction

ProbeMatchDTI introduces a probe-driven framework for drug‑target interaction prediction that preserves weak biochemical signals by using IterProbe to retain contextual states and BindingProbe to model cross‑entity complementarity at multiple scales. The method improves AUC‑ROC by 2.0% on BindingDB and 0.5% on DrugBank compared to prior biochemical representation learning approaches. Feature‑level analyses confirm the effectiveness of the probe-driven pattern matching, and the predictions are linked to an evidence‑guided downstream drug‑discovery workflow for candidate refinement and validation planning.

arXiv AI
Jul 10

DrugGen 2: A disease-aware language model for enhancing drug discovery

arXiv:2607. 08404v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current computational approaches for drug design typically focus on generating molecules conditioned on specific targets or general molecular properties, often neglecting the influence of disease context on target behavior and therapeutic outcomes.

By Ali Motahharynia, Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh-Esfahani, Mahsa Sheikholeslami, Navid Mazrouei, Matin Irajpour, Yousof Gheisari, Hajar Sirous
arXiv AI
Sep 21

SpecOpt: Contact-Diff Reasoning for Agentic Molecule Optimization Toward Binding Specificity

SpecOpt is a new molecular design task that optimizes the binding specificity of existing drugs by making constrained structural modifications. The method uses an agentic framework that docks a compound against its intended target and known off‑targets, compares residue‑aware atom‑protein contacts, and feeds the differential interactions to a large language model to propose changes. On a benchmark of 915 compounds, SpecOpt increased the target‑off‑target binding gap for 84.8% of cases while preserving drug‑like properties and structural similarity.

By Thao Nguyen, Heng Ji
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5

Beyond Random Splits: Evaluating Drug-Target Affinity Models Under Chemically and Biologically Motivated Distribution Shifts Copy

The study investigates how different distribution shifts affect the evaluation of drug‑target affinity (DTA) models, using 718,800 drug‑protein pairs from ChEMBL and BindingDB. It compares a baseline Morgan‑fingerprint + protein‑CNN model with 12 architectures that combine four drug representations and three ESM‑2 interaction modes, finding that mean validation RMSE rises significantly under protein‑cluster and dual out‑of‑distribution (OOD) scenarios. Model rankings remain consistent across chemical shifts but diverge under protein and dual OOD, indicating that architecture selection depends on the specific extrapolation context rather than just average error or training‑set size. Why it matters: The results suggest that DTA benchmarks should be designed to reflect the chemical and target shifts expected in real deployment, ensuring that chosen models perform reliably when applied to new chemical series or protein targets.

By Minjae Chung, Clara Li, Malar Paavai Muthukumaran, Shaunna Wang, Aniket Ramkrishnan Iyer, Shaun Qien Yeau Tan, Harinishree Sathu, Micky C. Nnamdi, J. Ben Tamo, Benoit Louis Marteau, May Dongmei Wang