arXiv:2608. 16259v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid progress of image generation models calls for AI-generated image (AIGI) detectors that are not only accurate but also explainable and reliable.
By Bowen Deng, Jiahui Zhan, Yikun Ji, Haozhen Yan, Jianfu Zhang
WorldFact-Bench is a new benchmark that tests image‑world consistency by presenting 1,274 real‑fake image pairs across four verification regimes and ten semantic domains, each pair containing a factual conflict while keeping the image visually plausible. The evaluation requires both images in a pair to be classified correctly, and the benchmark focuses on single‑image assessment without predefined claims. The authors also introduce PERSIST‑Agent, an iterative verification system that maintains a persistent state linking candidate facts, visual observations, evidence, and verification statuses, and shows improved pair accuracy over baseline methods on 8B backbones.
By Zhuohong Chen, Zhengxian Wu, Yunyao Yu, Hangrui Xu, Zijian Yu, Hao Tan, Zhifang Liu, Peng Jiao, Jun Lan, Haoqian Wang
FORGE is a forensic deepfake analysis system that provides region‑grounded natural language explanations for image manipulations. It addresses the inductive bias mismatch of multimodal large language models by adding a Vision‑Only Model trained on dense patch prediction, allowing the language model to interleave tokens with preserved spatial correspondence. Across face‑manipulated and fully synthetic content, FORGE delivers fine‑grained attribute queries and outperforms in‑domain baselines, with region‑specific evaluation and human studies confirming explanation faithfulness.
By Rohit Kundu, Shan Jia, Vishal Mohanty, Athula Balachandran, Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
arXiv:2606. 28510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Across social and online platforms, people are increasingly exposed to AI-generated images.
By Negar Kamali, Candice Rockell Gerstner, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh
The MSU team presents a modular approach to the Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge, combining multiple DINOv3 backbones with Mesorch manipulation-localization features for real/fake classification. They incorporate a Grounding-DINO-based pseudo-mask pipeline to generate artifact evidence maps and a local contrastive objective to separate artifact from authenticity cues. For explanations, class-conditional Qwen3-VL models produce complex descriptions, which are then simplified by a GRPO-optimized text model, achieving high detection and explanation scores on the XPlainVerse dataset.
By Artem Filippov, Aleksandr Gushchin, Kirill Koltsov, Dmitriy Vatolin, Anastasia Antsiferova
arXiv:2607. 22745v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rapid advances in image generation are eroding the evidentiary value of visual content in settings where authenticity can affect public safety and personal reputation.
By Yi-Zhi Wang, Yichen Xiao, Linan Yue, Weibo Gao, Yichao Du, Pengfei Fang, Shimin Di, Min-Ling Zhang
arXiv:2606. 03348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility.
By Junxiao Yang, Minghao Zhang, Xiaoce Wang, Haoran Liu, Shiyao Cui, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
arXiv:2606. 26552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of generative models presents a significant challenge to existing deepfake detection methods, particularly given the widespread dissemination of highly realistic AI-generated images.
By Yangjun Wu, Keyu Yan, Yu Liu, Jingren Zhou, Fei Huang, Rong Zhang, Zhou Zhao, Fei Wu
ASAP is an interactive visualization system that helps users identify and analyze deceptive patterns in AI‑generated images. It uses a CLIP‑adapted image encoder to produce interpretable representations and generates masks that highlight influential pixel regions, enabling influence measurement of key deceptive features. The system integrates these techniques into a dashboard for quantifying authenticity‑indicative patterns across collections of authentic and AI‑generated images, supporting comparative analysis of different generative models such as GANs and diffusion models, and its effectiveness is demonstrated through a user study and benchmark applications.
By Jinbin Huang, Yuki Ueno, Chen Chen, Aditi Mishra, Bum Chul Kwon, Zhicheng Liu, Chris Bryan
The paper introduces EpiReal-Bench, a benchmark of 10,000 false-claim prompts and corresponding images designed to test visual misinformation risks in commercial image generators. It also presents EpiReal-Attack, a black-box optimization framework that can bypass alignment safeguards, increasing the success rate of generating misleading images from 70% to 95%. Experiments on four commercial models show that these generators can produce credible visual evidence for false claims, highlighting a blind spot in current alignment methods.
By Zeyu Ye, Yanchun Li, Sibei He, Meng Xie, Hangtao Zhang, Xianlong Wang, Li Zeng, Jiahao Chen, Yichen Wang, Junhui Wang, Ziqi Zhou
arXiv:2604. 02694v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid progress of generative AI has enabled increasingly realistic text-centric image forgeries, posing major challenges to document safety.
By Fanwei Zeng, Changtao Miao, Jing Huang, Zhiya Tan, Shutao Gong, Xiaoming Yu, Yang Wang, Weibin Yao, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Jianshu Li, Ying Yan
arXiv:2608. 08021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) should answer from concrete image evidence rather than language priors, dataset shortcuts, or irrelevant visual context.
By Haojie Huang, Xinlei Yu, Chengming Xu, Zhangquan Chen, Cheng Yang, Qingdong He, Yu Yang, Jiangning Zhang, Xiaobin Hu