arXiv:2608.27831v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents are now commonly evaluated on the SWE-bench family of benchmarks, whose tasks are built from curated GitHub issues--long, structured, a...
arXiv:2607. 07391v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mathematical reasoning benchmarks typically provide all facts needed to solve each problem, while interactive benchmarks often mix reasoning with tools, retrieval, and long-horizon dialogue.
PremiseSQL introduces a benchmark of 1,800 flawed natural language to SQL (NL2SQL) queries, grouped into four categories of premise failures, alongside their original valid counterparts. The study evaluates large language models’ ability to critique flawed premises and abstain from generating misleading SQL, using an evaluation framework across three prompting settings. Results show that current models tend to trust premises and rarely critique them, while stronger critique-oriented prompting improves detection but also raises false invalid judgments and reduces SQL generation for valid queries.
arXiv:2610.19659v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: People delegate multi-step work to LLM agents and read only the reply that the agent hands back. Current evaluation scores task completion and the fait...
arXiv:2602. 23971v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sycophancy, the tendency of large language models to favour user-affirming responses over critical engagement, has been identified as an alignment failure, particularly in high-stakes advisory and social contexts.
Large language models have made natural language interfaces to databases (NLIDB) newly credible, but LLM text-to-SQL systems fail in a way that matters for deployment: a hallucinated column or a mis-a...
arXiv:2607. 14105v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For Large Language Models to reliably answer user queries, users must clearly specify requirements, context, and constraints.
arXiv:2609.14157v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed with external tools that extend what they can do beyond their own knowledge. Tools help on tasks...
arXiv:2608. 13926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models have made natural language interfaces to databases (NLIDB) newly credible, but LLM text-to-SQL systems fail in a way that matters for deployment: a hallucinated column or a mis-aggregated total yields a fluent wrong answer, indistinguishable at the point of use from a right one.
arXiv:2606. 26101v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable evaluation of large language models should separate supported answering from unsupported guessing without conflating either with data contamination, prompt idiosyncrasy, or generic refusal behavior.
arXiv:2608.30581v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are used as post hoc explainers of sequential decision-making policies, producing natural-language explanations of why an...
Large language models (LLMs) are used as post hoc explainers of sequential decision-making policies, producing natural-language explanations of why an action was chosen. However, LLMs often generate p...