arXiv Machine Learning

Does Pretraining Teach Chemical Language Models Chemistry?

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

A Large Scale Investigation of Scaling Limits in Chemical Language Models

The paper reports a large-scale, compute-controlled study of Chemical Language Models (CLMs) involving over 30,000 experiments across different molecular representations, tokenizations, model sizes, datasets, and architectures. It finds clear scaling trends in pretraining loss but shows that these improvements do not translate into proportional gains in goal-directed molecular design, with chemical syntax saturating early while semantic properties develop more slowly. The authors release a new suite of models, NovoMolGen, that achieves state-of-the-art results in drug discovery tasks, highlighting a disconnect between representation learning and downstream design and calling for new pretraining paradigms that target chemical semantics.

By Roshan Balaji, Kamran Chitsaz, Quentin Fournier, Nirav Pravinbhai Bhatt, Sarath Chandar
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

MolE-RAG: Molecular Structure-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Chemistry

arXiv:2606. 05693v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for molecular property prediction, but their ability to reason over chemical structures remains limited, as molecular representations such as SMILES differ substantially from the natural language on which LLMs are primarily trained.

By Joey Chan, Wonbin Kweon, Ashley Shin, Niharika Bhattacharjee, Pengcheng Jiang, Yue Guo, Jiawei Han
arXiv AI
Aug 19

Domain-Adapted Molecular Language Models for Efficient Search of Make-on-Demand Libraries

The study evaluates four pretrained molecular language models on six virtual libraries covering drug discovery, organic materials, and catalysis. It finds that native embeddings vary widely in performance, while molecular fingerprints remain consistently strong. Fine‑tuning the models on library‑specific data markedly improves sample efficiency, with several adapted encoders outperforming others across all tasks.

By Henrik Wille, Luis-Finley Sch\"utz, Felix Strieth-Kalthoff
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

MolSC: Leveraging Substituent Contributions to Enhance Fine-grained Molecular Understanding in LLMs

MolSC is a new dataset of 181,000 substituent-level examples that captures how attaching specific substituents to molecular scaffolds changes properties such as bioactivity and physicochemical descriptors. The authors also provide MolSC-Bench, a held‑out benchmark of 1,541 examples that are disjoint from MolSC at scaffold, substituent, and molecule levels. Experiments show that training molecular large language models on MolSC markedly improves their ability to predict substituent contributions, outperforming existing models on a range of downstream chemistry tasks.

By Hyuntae Park, Sooyeon Kim, Jiwon Park, SangKeun Lee
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Procedural Pretraining for Molecular Property Prediction

The paper proposes a three‑stage training pipeline that begins with procedural pretraining on abstract, procedurally generated data, followed by molecular pretraining on SMILES, and finally downstream fine‑tuning for molecular property prediction. Experiments show that procedural pretraining improves downstream performance—e.g., a 4.8% error reduction on Lipophilicity—especially when labeled data are scarce, and that the benefit peaks at an intermediate procedural training budget. Analysis indicates that transferable knowledge resides mainly in attention layers, while feed‑forward layers may over‑specialize.

By Moritz Friedemann, Zachary Shinnick, Philip Torr, Bruno Andreis
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Benchmarking Compositional Generalisation for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

The paper introduces a benchmark to evaluate compositional generalisation in machine learning interatomic potentials. It comprises four tasks that test models on unseen molecules, designed so that learning underlying chemical principles should enable generalisation. Experiments show that current state‑of‑the‑art models struggle, with out‑of‑distribution errors often an order of magnitude higher than in‑distribution errors, even for foundation models pre‑trained on millions of molecules.

By Amir Masoud Nourollah, Irtaza Khalid, Stefano Leoni, Steven Schockaert