arXiv:2510. 19771v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly moving towards proactivity: rather than awaiting instruction, they exercise agency to anticipate user needs and solve them autonomously.
arXiv:2607. 05174v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents, i.
arXiv:2607. 02846v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents can improve through accumulated experience, but free-form textual memories become difficult to maintain, validate, and reuse as interactions grow.
arXiv:2607. 01531v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning how an environment behaves from interaction is central to building agents that adapt to unfamiliar tasks.
AgentMercury is a scalable framework that synthesizes executable environments from high‑level business scenarios instead of task‑specific benchmarks. It creates a persistent world with entities, services, tools, and invariants, allowing diverse tasks and interaction trajectories to emerge naturally. The authors generated 4,783 environments across 14 industries and 50 countries, and training reinforcement‑learning agents on them improved performance on enterprise workflows and out‑of‑domain benchmarks, while the construction process itself can be learned to increase authoring success.
arXiv:2609.19134v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific code repositories encode decades of human knowledge in executable models, methods, and tools. Yet fragmented toolchains, implicit domain con...
The article surveys LLM-based agentic reasoning frameworks, presenting a unified formal language that categorizes them into single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methods. It reviews application scenarios in scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, society, economics, and general-purpose tasks, and compares the distinct features and evaluation strategies of each category. The survey highlights the rapid development of complex agentic systems in real-world contexts.
arXiv:2607. 01531v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning how an environment behaves from interaction is central to building agents that adapt to unfamiliar tasks.
ExplorationBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate AI systems’ ability to conduct scientific exploration in verifiable alien worlds, where rules are executable and can be precisely checked. It consists of two sandboxes—AlienCode and AlienLogic—each offering discovery targets, tasks, flawed manuals, environmental feedback, and tool‑call schemas. The benchmark tests whether systems can generate new hypotheses, design experiments, and iterate on results, rather than merely recalling pre‑trained knowledge, and finds that top performers can acquire and apply unfamiliar rules, though performance varies across exploration trajectories.
ExplorationBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate AI systems’ ability to conduct scientific exploration in verifiable alien worlds. It comprises two sandbox environments—AlienCode and AlienLogic—each containing discovery targets, tasks, flawed manuals, and tool‑call schemas that force systems to formulate hypotheses, design experiments, and iterate on results. Ten AI systems were tested, revealing that while the best performers can learn and apply unfamiliar rules, their progress varies across exploration trajectories and can even regress with continued exploration.
arXiv:2606. 13662v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents have shown increasing potential in automating scientific discovery.
arXiv:2607. 00627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are powerful pattern-completion systems, but their default operating mode - predicting the next token from a static context - does not reliably produce persistent, manipulable representations of an external world.