Hugging Face Trending Papers

Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning?

arXiv Computer Vision

Aug 25

Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning?

arXiv:2608.23074v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) can answer spatial questions, yet the mechanisms connecting object grounding to spatial reasoning remain poorly understoo...

By Xiwei Liu, Yulong Li, Xinlin Zhuang, Xuhui Li, Zhixiang Lu, Haolin Yang, Imran Razzak, Yutong Xie

llms multimodal benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 16

Thinking with Visual Grounding

arXiv:2606. 16122v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visual thinking should not only sound right; it should show its evidence.

By Junkai Zhang, Yihe Deng, Kai-Wei Chang, Wei Wang

llms agents reinforcement-learning multimodal benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 19

Do Vision-Language Models Understand 3D Scenes or Just Catalogue Objects?

arXiv:2605. 20448v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models reliably name objects in a scene, but do they represent the 3D layout those objects inhabit?

By Animesh Maheshwari, Divyansh Sahu, Nishit Verma

llms robotics multimodal benchmarks

arXiv Computation and Language

Aug 25

Knowing Isn't Always Saying: When Do Spatial Encodings Reach Answers in Vision-Language Models?

arXiv:2608.22916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are known to encode spatial information in their hidden states, yet often fail to use it when answering. However, it remains unc...

By Zeyu Wang, Xinming Xu

llms multimodal

arXiv AI

Jun 3

Imaginative Perception Tokens Enhance Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models

arXiv:2606. 03988v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision language models (VLMs) excel at many tasks but still struggle with spatial reasoning when critical information is not directly observable.

By Mahtab Bigverdi, Lindsey Li, Weikai Huang, Yiming Liu, Jaemin Cho, Jieyu Zhang, Tuhin Kundu, Chris Dangjoo Kim, Zelun Luo, Linda Shapiro, Ranjay Krishna

llms multimodal benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 12

Perceive, Interact, Reason: Building Tool-Augmented Visual Agents for Spatial Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 12830v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While recent vision-language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong multimodal understanding, they remain limited in spatial reasoning tasks that require active evidence acquisition and multi-step visual interaction.

By Changye Li, Meng Lu, Yi Wu, Ligeng Zhu

llms agents multimodal benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 8

The Dual Mechanisms of Spatial Variable Binding in Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2603. 22278v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Many multimodal tasks, such as image captioning and visual question answering, require vision-language models (VLMs) to bind objects with their properties and spatial relations.

By Kelly Cui, Nikhil Prakash, Shoval Messica, Ayush Raina, David Bau, Antonio Torralba, Tamar Rott Shaham

llms nlp multimodal

arXiv AI

Jun 17

Reinforcing Dual-Path Reasoning in Spatial Vision Language Models

arXiv:2606. 17539v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spatial VLMs have made substantial progress in geometric perception, yet complex spatial reasoning requiring multi-step inference over depth, distance, and scene relations remains challenging.

By Yatai Ji, An-Chieh Cheng, Yang Fu, Yukang Chen, Han Zhang, Zhaojing Yang, Wei Huang, Ka Chun Cheung, Song Han, Vidya Nariyambut Murali, Pavlo Molchanov, Jan Kautz, Simon See, Hongxu Yin, Ping Luo, Sifei Liu

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning multimodal benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Aug 24

Is Visual Prompting All You Need? Studying VLM Spatial Reasoning under Progressive Visual Scaffolds

The paper investigates how visual presentation affects vision‑language models (VLMs) on the SPaRC spatial planning benchmark. By adding lightweight input‑side scaffolds that keep the visual modality but make spatial structure clearer, the authors achieve up to a 34.0‑percentage‑point accuracy boost across multiple VLMs, and an additional 4.6 points when combined with GRPO training. Analyses reveal that these improvements stem mainly from reduced grounding errors, while rule‑based reasoning remains difficult, highlighting visual presentation as a key determinant of whether VLM benchmarks test grounded perception, downstream reasoning, or both.

By Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Tianyu Yang, Florian Valentin Wunderlich, Terry Ruas, Jan Philip Wahle, Daniel Kurzawe, Bela Gipp

llms computer-vision multimodal benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 5

SpatialCLI: Learning to Reason With Spatial Tools, Then Without Them

arXiv:2607. 27703v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in embodied agents to interpret visual inputs, reason about spatial relationships, and make task-level decisions based on that reasoning.

By Yang Zhou, Zixuan Huang, Sunzhu Li, Zhuo Yang, Chen Zhang, Shunian Chen, Caijun Yan, Jianyao Xu, Shunyu Liu, Weijie Fu, Peiliang Li, Xiaozhi Chen, Yuxiang Cai

llms agents computer-vision reinforcement-learning robotics fine-tuning multimodal benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 7

SpatialThinker: Reinforcing Scene Graph-Grounded Spatial Reasoning via Dense Rewards

arXiv:2511. 07403v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in vision-language tasks, but continue to struggle with spatial reasoning.

By Hunar Batra, Haoqin Tu, Hardy Chen, Yuanze Lin, Cihang Xie, Ronald Clark

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning multimodal benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 4

From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 04381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space.

By Chen Chu, Bita Azarijoo, Li Xiong, Khurram Shafique, Cyrus Shahabi

llms multimodal benchmarks

Related stories