arXiv:2606. 16603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in data-intensive analytical tasks, yet their outputs are rarely verifiable: a reliance on linear text trajectories makes their reasoning difficult to audit.
By Jiajie Jin, Zhao Yang, Wenle Liao, Yuyang Hu, Guanting Dong, Xiaoxi Li, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou
arXiv:2609.39786v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly combined with knowledge graphs (KGs) to ground reasoning in structured evidence. However, most LLM-based...
By Ola El Khatib, Djellel Difallah
arXiv:2604. 01993v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-hop QA benchmarks often reward Large Language Models (LLMs) for spurious correctness, where models reach correct answers through invalid intermediate reasoning.
By Daeyong Kwon, Soyoung Yoon, Seung-won Hwang
arXiv:2508. 01273v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Explicit knowledge conflicts, occurring when retrieved contexts contain contradictory information, pose a fundamental challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) as they integrate increasingly diverse data sources.
By Xianda Zheng, Zijian Huang, Meng-Fen Chiang, Jiamou Liu, Yuan Fang, Michael Witbrock, Kaiqi Zhao
arXiv:2607. 14149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although large language models (LLMs) have set benchmarks for zero-shot reasoning, their deployment remains cost-prohibitive and environmentally taxing.
By Dimitrios Kelesis, Konstantinos Bougiatiotis, Georgios Paliouras
arXiv:2609.13808v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Structured knowledge fact checking aims to determine the truthfulness of natural language claims by reasoning over structured evidence. Recent program-...
By Yifei Li, Xiaohan Zheng, Wentao Qian, Liansheng Zhuang
The paper introduces the Structure-Internalized Rule Language Model (SIRLM) to improve Knowledge Graph Reasoning (KGR) by addressing the mismatch between KG structural context and Large Language Model (LLM) parametric knowledge. SIRLM centers on a Structure-Internalized Rule Generator (SIRG) that uses in-context learning, a structural relation memory, a KG tokenizer, and a neuro-symbolic reasoner to generate structural rules and provide faithful rule-execution feedback. Experiments on 36 datasets against 17 state‑of‑the‑art KGR methods show that SIRLM achieves significant performance gains.
By Xingrui Zhuo, Jiapu Wang, Manzong Huang, Gongqing Wu, Xindong Wu
arXiv:2602.02427v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant breakthroughs across various domains, but they can still produce unreliable or misleading ou...
By Qihao Wen, Jiahao Wang, Yang Nan, Pengfei He, Ravi Tandon, Han Xu
The paper investigates whether natural language inference (NLI) can be performed using only interpretable, graph-based representations of evidence. It introduces a pipeline that decomposes sentences into atomic propositions, maps them to ConceptNet triples, and feeds three graphs—premise, hypothesis, and a retrieved ConceptNet subgraph—into a fine‑tuned 0.8‑billion‑parameter language model. On the SNLI dataset the graph‑only model reaches 89.7% accuracy, close to a text‑based baseline, while on ANLI it matches RoBERTa‑large on rounds R2 and R3 but lags on R1, illustrating a trade‑off between interpretability and performance.
By Younes Boufouss (LISN), Luc Pommeret (LISN, CNRS), Thomas Gerald (LISN), Patrick Paroubek (LISN, CNRS), Sophie Rosset (LISN, CNRS)
arXiv:2604. 12503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various tasks but remain prone to hallucinations in knowledge-intensive scenarios.
By Shuai Wang, Xixi Wang, Yinan Yu
The paper introduces GRACE, a framework that breaks down large language model (LLM) responses into atomic claims and grounds them against trusted knowledge priors using a weighted bipartite graph. Edge weights enable weighted centrality analysis to classify claims as Grounded, Refuted, or Boundary, identifying hallucinations and frontier knowledge. An objective called Return on Attention (RoA) prioritizes expert review only for high‑uncertainty claims, and verified claims become new evidence anchors, creating a loop that expands the knowledge base across iterations.
By John Seon Keun Yi, Joshua R. Minot, Dokyun Lee
arXiv:2608.30413v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Defeasible reasoning is a type of reasoning where inferences are drawn from plausible current evidence, but can be retracted upon the introduction of n...
By Jayanta Sadhu, Sayem Shahad, Kenneth Marino