arXiv:2607. 19360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often answer queries by mapping individual observations to more general rule-like structures.
arXiv:2606. 11961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as conditional generators for structured data, relying on in-context learning (ICL) to adapt to new distributions without parameter updates.
arXiv:2609.24238v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We reproduce and stress-test the work of Yu et al. (2023), who characterize how language models (LMs) arbitrate between memorized knowledge and contrad...
arXiv:2603. 01097v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continuous knowledge updating for pre-trained large language models (LLMs) is increasingly necessary yet remains challenging.
arXiv:2607. 06160v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthesizing long-context supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data is a scalable way to enhance the long-context understanding of large language models (LLMs), yet existing approaches share three limitations: narrow task coverage, insufficient instruction difficulty, and a lack of faithfulness supervision.
arXiv:2609.00759v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly handle in-context learning (ICL) tasks where a long, novel context defines the rules, knowledge, and output s...
The paper proposes that large language models (LLMs) encode high‑level concepts as linear directions within their activation space and that they can use subspaces and vector algebra to perform tasks. By analyzing functional modules and residual streams during in‑context learning (ICL), the authors find that LLMs can create evidence‑accumulating subspaces and solve ICL tasks through simple algebraic operations within those subspaces.
The paper investigates how large language models learn new tasks in-context, comparing rule-based instruction following to example-based few-shot prompting across five diverse tasks. Results show that models generally learn more reliably from rule descriptions than from examples alone, and adding more examples does not consistently improve performance. Instruction tuning further enhances rule-based learning while preserving example-based capabilities, with rule advantages being strongest for algebraic tasks and weaker for tasks requiring distributional sensitivity or parametric knowledge.
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) perform multi‑hop reasoning and challenges the prevailing hop‑aligned circuit hypothesis, which posits that bridge entities are computed sequentially across layers. Through systematic analyses of real‑world multi‑hop queries, the authors discover a phenomenon called layer‑order inversion, where later‑hop answer entities become decodable earlier than bridge entities, and this effect grows with the number of hops. They propose a probabilistic recall‑and‑extract framework that models multi‑hop reasoning as broad probabilistic recall in shallow MLP layers followed by selective extraction in deeper attention layers, and validate this framework with probing analyses that reinterpret prior evidence, explain chain‑of‑thought gains, and diagnose multi‑hop failures.
As large language models (LLMs) grow more capable, they are increasingly deployed in context-rich settings where task inputs are often accompanied by long, partially irrelevant context. In a controlled setting, we find that state-of-the-art models often appear robust to task-irrelevant context at the aggregate level: prepending it to benchmark questions causes little change in overall accuracy.
arXiv:2601. 22588v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as reference-free evaluators via prompting, but this "LLM-as-a-Judge" paradigm is costly, opaque, and sensitive to prompt design.
arXiv:2608.30413v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Defeasible reasoning is a type of reasoning where inferences are drawn from plausible current evidence, but can be retracted upon the introduction of n...
arXiv:2607. 08393v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-tuning LLMs to inject new knowledge faces a critical challenge: LLMs can quickly memorize new facts, yet fail to use them for downstream reasoning tasks.