The paper introduces PriCoder, a method for teaching large language models (LLMs) to effectively use private library APIs for code generation. PriCoder synthesizes training data by constructing a graph and applying two operators—Progressive Graph Evolution to increase diversity and Multidimensional Graph Pruning to enhance quality. Experiments on three mainstream LLMs demonstrate that PriCoder boosts private‑library code generation by over 20% in pass@1, while leaving general code generation largely unchanged.
arXiv:2603. 19258v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Differentially private (DP) fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) requires massive compute and full model access, which rules out state-of-the-art proprietary APIs for general users.
arXiv:2604. 24222v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on general code generation, but their effectiveness drops sharply in enterprise settings where software development relies on internal private libraries absent from public pre-training corpora.
arXiv:2508.02601v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tabular data derives its value from inter-feature dependencies, yet preserving them during synthesis is fragile when samples are scarce. Exis...
arXiv:2603. 14501v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models excel in high-resource programming languages but struggle with low-resource ones.
arXiv:2608. 04255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph inference over relational data can expose sensitive edge information, and this risk becomes more severe in dynamic graphs, where repeated model updates cause privacy loss to accumulate.
arXiv:2606. 10481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) can exhibit problematic memorization of individual training examples.
The paper investigates whether code large language models (CodeLLMs) inadvertently reproduce proprietary or sensitive code by evaluating seven state‑of‑the‑art training data detection (TDD) methods on eight CodeLLMs. It introduces CodeSnitch, a benchmark of 9,000 function‑level code samples across three languages, each labeled as included or excluded from training data, and applies mutation strategies based on the Type‑1 to Type‑4 code clone taxonomy to test TDD robustness. The study offers a systematic assessment of current TDD techniques for code and suggests directions for developing more effective detection methods.
arXiv:2606. 03657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models for code generation often need to use APIs that are absent from their pretraining data.
arXiv:2505. 03818v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve strong performance on everyday coding tasks, but they can fail on complex tasks that require non-trivial reasoning about program semantics.
arXiv:2608. 14094v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud-local LLM inference systems have the potential to use the reasoning capability of large cloud models while protecting sensitive user data on personal devices.
arXiv:2604. 07486v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for synthetic data generation.
arXiv:2408. 03910v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in stand-alone code tasks like HumanEval and MBPP, but struggle with handling entire code repositories.