arXiv AI
Jul 7
Auto: The AGI Compiler
arXiv:2607. 04542v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Every LLM agent run re-derives its behavior token by token on a frontier model: brilliant, expensive, slow, and unbounded.
Compile, Then Page: Executable SOP Programs and a Capability-Gated Runtime for Procedural LLM Agents
arXiv:2607. 11346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise agents must follow long-horizon, conditional, safety-critical standard operating procedures (SOPs).
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 12
Auditing Automated Evaluation, Error Propagation, and Runtime Mitigation in Tool-Using Language Agents
arXiv:2604. 16706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automated evaluation of tool-using large language model (LLM) agents is widely assumed to be reliable, yet this assumption is rarely validated against human annotation.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Instruction Stacking Collapse: A Benchmark and the Capability-Dependent Value of Prompt Compilation
arXiv:2608. 02639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production prompts rarely carry a single instruction.
arXiv AI
Aug 6
Diagnosing Tool-Selection Reasoning in LLM Agents with Canary Tools
arXiv:2608. 04719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent evaluations tell us that a model picked the wrong tool, but rarely why.
arXiv AI
5d ago
Architecture as Capability Equalizer for Coding Agents
arXiv:2608.21747v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based coding agents generate complete software systems from high-level descriptions, yet little is known about how the format of architecture spe...
arXiv AI
Jul 22
Prompt Design at Scale: How Format, Instruction Count, and Context Length Shape Instruction Adherence and Hallucination in Large Language Models
arXiv:2607. 19257v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Practitioners make three prompt-design decisions with almost no controlled evidence behind them: how to format instructions and context (markdown, plain text, prose, or tabular), how many simultaneous instructions a system prompt can carry before compliance degrades, and how much context a model can hold before recall and honesty degrade.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
StateM: Reaching 95.3% Raw Accuracy, or a \$15 Frontier Run, on Terminal-Bench 2.1 via Harness Scaling
arXiv:2608. 15089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon agents can fail even when their underlying models can solve the constituent steps.
arXiv AI
Jul 9
Operational Reframing and Approval-Framed Delegation in Multi-Agent LLM Safety
arXiv:2607. 07097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety evaluations of multi-agent LLM systems often compare a direct prompt with a planner-executor pipeline and report the difference as a single "pipeline effect.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 5
Diagnosing Tool-Selection Reasoning in LLM Agents with Canary Tools
Agent evaluations tell us that a model picked the wrong tool, but rarely why. We introduce canary tools: diagnostic probe tools planted in an agent's Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool set, each engineered to probe one specific tool-selection weakness.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Where Instruction Hierarchy Breaks: Diagnosing and Repairing Failures in Reasoning Language Models
arXiv:2606. 07808v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning language models deployed in agentic workflows must follow an instruction hierarchy: when instructions from different sources conflict, the model should obey the highest-privilege applicable instruction.
arXiv AI
Jul 24
ExecuGraph: A Multi-Agent, Execution-Grounded Framework for Reliable Backend Code Synthesis with Large Language Models
arXiv:2607. 20499v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models generate plausible backend code, but a single-pass paradigm provides no guarantee of correctness or runtime reliability.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Compiled AI: Deterministic Code Generation for LLM-Based Workflow Automation
arXiv:2604. 05150v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study compiled AI, a paradigm in which large language models generate executable code artifacts during a compilation phase, after which workflows execute deterministically without further model invocation.